ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd
| Small Cap
ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd operates within the Construction & Engineering sector, presenting a mixed financial landscape. The company demonstrates exceptional performance in solvency, primarily due to its negative debt ratios. However, liquidity is a significant concern, with poor current, cash, and operating cash flow ratios. Efficiency metrics are highly variable, featuring strong receivables turnover but weak inventory management and capital turnover. Growth is also a major area of concern, as the company shows negative trends in revenue, EPS, asset, and net income growth. Coverage ratios are notably low, indicating difficulties in meeting interest and dividend obligations. Profitability metrics are generally weak, with negative margins and returns. Overall, the company exhibits financial instability with potential risks, offset by its strong solvency position and some efficiency in managing receivables.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsHighly Undervalued
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio3.20
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio6.33
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio3.36
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd operates within the Construction & Engineering sector, presenting a mixed financial landscape. The company demonstrates exceptional performance in solvency, primarily due to its negative debt ratios. However, liquidity is a significant concern, with poor current, cash, and operating cash flow ratios. Efficiency metrics are highly variable, featuring strong receivables turnover but weak inventory management and capital turnover. Growth is also a major area of concern, as the company shows negative trends in revenue, EPS, asset, and net income growth. Coverage ratios are notably low, indicating difficulties in meeting interest and dividend obligations. Profitability metrics are generally weak, with negative margins and returns. Overall, the company exhibits financial instability with potential risks, offset by its strong solvency position and some efficiency in managing receivables.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
0.00
Industry Median
22.22
Small Cap Median
21.91
P/E RATIO
0.00
P/B RATIO
0.00
Industry Median
2.55
Small Cap Median
2.53
P/S RATIO
17.85
Industry Median
31.09
Small Cap Median
34.82
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
0.00
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth ratios show a mixed performance. While operating profit growth is very strong, significant declines in revenue, EPS, asset, and net income growth are concerning. This suggests operational inefficiencies and potential financial distress. Addressing these negative growth trends is crucial for long-term viability and success.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -14.19 | 16.53 | 39.45 | -20.35 | -48.6 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 137.93 | 76.81 | -93.44 | 475 | -71.74 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -674.12 | 112.52 | -105.35 | -689.23 | -77.68 |
| Asset Growth Rate | -4.31 | -5.87 | 0.25 | 0.63 | -1.37 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -677.78 | 111.54 | -105.45 | -683.33 | -77.14 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The financial ratios highlight challenges. The poor adjusted and cash earnings per share, along with a negative book value per share, are significant concerns. However, there is a positive aspect with capital expenditures, suggesting ongoing investments in the company's future. Addressing the negative EPS and book value while sustaining capital investments is crucial for improving overall financial health.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -22.61 | -47.83 | 2.61 | -15.22 | -3.48 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | -17.83 | -47.39 | 3.04 | -14.78 | -3.04 |
| Book Value Per Share | -9.57 | -57.83 | -55.22 | -70 | -73.48 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 3.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios are generally weak, with negative gross profit, operating, and net margins, along with low returns on capital, equity, and assets. This suggests significant challenges in generating profits from its operations and investments. It is essential to improve operational efficiency and revenue generation to enhance overall profitability.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -32.26 | -42.56 | -2.23 | -14.64 | -8.48 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -2.99 | -7.09 | 0.6 | -2.17 | -0.48 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | -4.09 | -7.68 | -0.5 | -2.87 | -0.82 |
| Operating Margin | -27.82 | -42.21 | -1.99 | -14.33 | -7.88 |
| Net Margin | -20.97 | -38.06 | 1.49 | -10.9 | -4.85 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While the receivables turnover and receivable days are strong, indicating effective credit and collection policies, the fixed asset and capital turnover ratios are less promising. This suggests potential inefficiencies in utilizing assets and capital to generate revenue. Optimizing asset utilization could lead to improved profitability and operational performance. Inventory turnover is also very poor, which is a cause for concern.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 7.75 | 8.26 | 10.89 | 8.92 | 4.58 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 6.21 | 13.73 | 12.12 | 8.27 | 2.98 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 13.41 | 17.52 | 36.64 | 30.57 | 18.33 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 58.78 | 26.58 | 30.12 | 44.14 | 122.48 |
| Receivable Days | 27.22 | 20.83 | 9.96 | 11.94 | 19.91 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.11 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are low, especially interest coverage, indicating difficulties in meeting its debt obligations. The absence of equity dividend coverage further highlights financial strains. Strengthening the ability to cover interest expenses and potentially providing dividend coverage could enhance financial stability and investor confidence.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 3.2 | -24 | -53 | 9 | -32 | N/A |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The solvency of the company presents a very strong position, characterized by negative debt ratios and a high equity ratio. This suggests a very low reliance on debt financing, making it less vulnerable to financial distress. The company's assets are primarily funded by equity, offering stability and a reduced risk of insolvency. This robust solvency provides a solid foundation for future growth and operational flexibility.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0 | 0 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0 | 0 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0 |
| Equity Ratio | 1 | 1 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The liquidity position seems concerning. While the quick ratio suggests some ability to meet short-term obligations, the current and cash ratios indicate potential difficulties in covering immediate liabilities. The negative operating cash flow ratio further exacerbates these concerns, suggesting the company is not generating enough cash from its operations to cover its short-term needs. This situation could impact its ability to manage day-to-day expenses and invest in future growth.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.93 | 0.9 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sonu Infratech Ltd | 6.76 | 4.17 | Neutral | 29.00 | 9.67 | 13.00 |
| 2 | Tarmat Ltd | 5.17 | 21.03 | Undervalued | 7.00 | 2.62 | 6.00 |
| 3 | Konstelec Engineers Ltd | 4.97 | 15.62 | Highly Undervalued | 19.00 | 4.96 | 7.00 |
| 4 | Banka Bioloo Ltd | 4.77 | -7.38 | Neutral | 5.21 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| 5 | ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd | 4.67 | 0.00 | Highly Undervalued | -13.00 | -4.18 | -8.00 |
| 6 | Teamo Productions HQ Ltd | 3.71 | -9.80 | Neutral | -0.07 | 0.00 | -1.04 |
Management effectiveness is weak due to persistent financial challenges. Declining sales, negative profit margins, and substantial debt raise concerns about the management's ability to achieve profitability and sustainable growth. Negative ROCE and ROE indicate inefficient capital utilization and poor shareholder returns. These fundamental issues need resolution to improve financial health and investor confidence.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONS | Sales Growth | -17% (3Y), -48% (TTM) | Declining revenue trend |
| CONS | Operating Profit Margin | -42.95% (Mar 2025) | Poor operational efficiency |
| CONS | Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -2.21% | Inefficient use of capital |
| CONS | Debt/Equity Ratio | High | Excessive leverage |
| CONS | Dividend Payout | 0% | No profit sharing with investors |
Financial Performance & Growth
ARSS Infrastructure Projects exhibits declining financial performance. Compounded Sales Growth is negative, with a 3-year growth of -17% and a TTM growth of -48%, indicating a revenue contraction. Operating Profit Margin (OPM) is also negative, with the latest quarterly OPM at -42.95% (Mar 2025), reflecting poor operational efficiency. The company reported negative Net Profit for the latest quarter (-9.50 Cr in Mar 2025) and fiscal year (-8 Cr in Mar 2025), highlighting its struggle to achieve profitability.
| Metric | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | -8.71% | 5.64% | 39.37% | -20.29% | -48.46% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Capital efficiency and returns are weak. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is negative at -2.21%, indicating the company is not generating returns from its capital investments. The Return on Equity (ROE) is 0%, suggesting that shareholder funds are not being utilized effectively to produce profits.
| Metric | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | -3.00% | -6.00% | 1.00% | -2.00% | -0.00% |
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health is concerning due to high debt levels. The company has substantial borrowings, with total borrowings at ₹1,629 Cr as of March 2025. The Debt/Equity ratio is also very high, indicating significant financial leverage. The company has not been distributing dividends, with a Dividend Payout % of 0%.
| Metric | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (Cr) | 1764.00 | 1638.33 | 1626.00 | 1632.00 | 1629.00 |
Strategic & Operational Indicators
ARSS Infrastructure Projects exhibits mixed strategic and operational indicators. Debtor Days have fluctuated but generally remain low, with the latest figure at 20 days (Mar 2025). Inventory Days are high at 1,120 days (Mar 2025), indicating challenges in inventory management. Similarly, Days Payable are also high at 646 days (Mar 2025), suggesting extended payment cycles to suppliers. The Cash Conversion Cycle is 494 days (Mar 2025), indicating inefficiency in working capital management.
| Metric | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 42.33 | 22.00 | 11 | 10 | 20 |
| Inventory Days | 120.67 | 69.33 | 205 | 385 | 1120 |
| Days Payable | 97.00 | 59.67 | 164 | 417 | 646 |
The overall risk is high due to significant financial challenges, including declining sales, negative profit margins, high debt levels, and inefficient capital utilization. Negative ROCE and ROE indicate poor returns on investments and equity. Operational inefficiencies, as reflected in the high cash conversion cycle, further exacerbate the risk profile.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available to quantify off-balance sheet exposures for ARSS Infrastructure Projects. Without this information, it is difficult to assess potential financial risks or obligations that are not immediately apparent from the balance sheet.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available to evaluate contingent liabilities for ARSS Infrastructure Projects. The absence of this information makes it challenging to determine potential future obligations or claims that could impact the company's financial stability.
Accounting quality red flags
The continuous losses and negative profit margins warrant closer scrutiny of accounting practices to ensure accurate and transparent financial reporting.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe