Growth Ratio Summary

Growth Score : 1.00

The growth metrics are poor, reflecting significant negative growth rates across all key areas. Revenue, operating profit, EPS, assets, and net income have all experienced substantial declines, signaling serious challenges. The negative trends raise concerns about the company's ability to sustain its operations and compete effectively within its industry. Addressing these issues is crucial for the company's survival and future prospects. The company is undergoing a severe contraction.

Financial Ratio Summary

Financial Score : 3.60

The financial metrics present a mixed picture. The adjusted EPS and book value per share are quite low, while capital expenditures are relatively high. The cash earnings per share is a silver lining. The company needs to ensure that its capital expenditures translate into improved earnings and shareholder value. The company should focus on efficient capital allocation and improved earnings performance.

Profitability Ratio Summary

Profitability Score : 5.60

The profitability ratios demonstrate strong performance, indicating the company's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, assets, and equity. High values for gross profit margin, ROCE, ROE, ROA, operating margin, and net margin suggest efficient operations and effective management. These results underscore the company's ability to generate profits effectively. However, the company needs to maintain these high levels of profitability to sustain long-term growth.

Efficiency Ratio Summary

Efficiency Score : 1.33

The efficiency metrics are generally weak, indicating operational inefficiencies. The fixed asset turnover ratio is low, suggesting that the company is not generating enough revenue from its fixed assets. Similarly, the inventory turnover ratio is low, indicating slow-moving inventory. While the receivable days outstanding is a positive aspect, other efficiency metrics need improvement to enhance overall operational performance. The lack of revenue generation from assets is a critical issue.

Coverage Ratio Summary

Coverage Score : 4.40

The coverage ratios reflect a mixed performance. While the interest coverage ratio is adequate, the equity dividend coverage ratio is weak. The interest coverage ratio suggests the company has the ability to meet its interest payments, but the lack of equity dividend coverage indicates that the company does not have enough earnings to cover potential dividend payments. There is a need to balance debt obligations with the ability to provide returns to equity holders.

Solvency Ratio Summary

Solvency Score : 4.00

The solvency position is relatively strong, indicating a healthy capital structure. Low values for both the debt ratio and debt-to-equity ratio suggest that the company relies less on debt financing and more on equity. The equity ratio also reflects a solid base of owner's equity. The debt to asset ratio indicates that the company has a small portion of its assets financed by debt. However, the equity ratio has declined over the past few years, which may need to be addressed to maintain a balanced capital structure.

Liquidity Ratio Summary

Liquidity Score : 2.00

The liquidity position is weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. While the current ratio suggests some ability to cover liabilities, the quick and cash ratios reveal a concerning lack of liquid assets. Low operating cash flow further exacerbates the problem. On a positive note, the current ratio has generally shown improvement over the past few years, but there is significant room for improvement to align with industry standards. The weighted average calculation underscores the need for the company to bolster its liquid assets to ensure financial resilience.