CLC Industries Ltd
| Small Cap
Health Score : 3.71CLC Industries Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strong performance in solvency and efficiency, particularly in managing its debt and inventory. However, it faces challenges in liquidity, growth, coverage, financial ratios, and profitability, where the performance is notably weak. Capital expenditures are well-managed, providing some financial flexibility. Overall, the company's financial health is moderate, characterized by efficient asset utilization and stable solvency, but constrained by low liquidity and growth prospects. The textiles and apparel industry is influenced by changing fashion trends, global supply chain disruptions, and consumer spending patterns, all of which could influence the company's prospects. While the company maintains financial stability, future success will depend on improving liquidity, fostering growth, and improving profitability.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation Metrics
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Health Score : 3.71CLC Industries Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strong performance in solvency and efficiency, particularly in managing its debt and inventory. However, it faces challenges in liquidity, growth, coverage, financial ratios, and profitability, where the performance is notably weak. Capital expenditures are well-managed, providing some financial flexibility. Overall, the company's financial health is moderate, characterized by efficient asset utilization and stable solvency, but constrained by low liquidity and growth prospects. The textiles and apparel industry is influenced by changing fashion trends, global supply chain disruptions, and consumer spending patterns, all of which could influence the company's prospects. While the company maintains financial stability, future success will depend on improving liquidity, fostering growth, and improving profitability.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
P/B RATIO
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
P/S RATIO
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
Others
PEG RATIO
N/A
EV/EBITDA RATIO
N/A
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
Quarterly Report⬤22nd Jan 26
Quarterly Financial Results Q3 FY 2025-26
BEARISH SENTIMENT
Growth Score : 2.00The growth ratio exposes considerable difficulties in growing revenue, profits, and assets. The implication is that the company is not growing at a healthy rate. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data. The company needs to implement strategies to boost revenue and profitability.
Revenue Growth RatePoorOperating Profit Growth RatePoorEarnings Per Share (EPS) GrowthPoorAsset Growth RatePoorNet Income Growth RatePoor| Growth Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -20.32 | -12.31 | -2.13 | -38.54 | -48.96 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -97.18 | -600 | 610 | -47.89 | 48.65 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | 203.49 | 22.07 | 195.2 | -62.67 | -68.51 |
| Asset Growth Rate | N/A | -2.11 | -43.72 | -39.09 | -3.94 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 207.14 | 22.09 | 194.29 | -62.78 | -68.7 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
Financial Score : 3.60The financial ratios are mixed, with capital expenditures being well-managed but other metrics showing areas of concern. The implication is that the company's financial performance is inconsistent. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data.
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)PoorCash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)PoorBook Value Per SharePoorDividend Per Share (DPS)Poor
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)Excellent| Financial Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -9.56 | -11.67 | -34.33 | -12.78 | -4 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | -7.89 | -10 | -32.78 | -11.56 | -2.89 |
| Book Value Per Share | -31.22 | -42.89 | -76.67 | -87.44 | -94.89 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
Profitability Score : 2.00The profitability ratios reveal general difficulties in generating profits. The implication is that the company is not efficiently converting revenue into profit. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data. The company needs to improve its cost management and pricing strategies.
Gross Profit MarginPoorReturn on Capital Employed (ROCE)PoorReturn on Equity (ROE)PoorReturn on Assets (ROA)PoorOperating MarginPoorNet MarginPoor| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -1.43 | -3.13 | -10.88 | -10 | -26.53 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 0.5 | -1.54 | 338.36 | -18.63 | -2.95 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.26 | -1.35 | -17.03 | -14.57 | -22.54 |
| Operating Margin | 0.22 | -1.25 | -9.09 | -7.71 | -22.45 |
| Net Margin | -9.45 | -13.16 | -39.56 | -23.96 | -14.69 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Efficiency Score : 4.67The efficiency ratio highlights some successes in inventory and receivables management. The implication is that the company is effective at converting inventory and receivables into sales. However, it also indicates some trouble with fixed asset and capital turnover. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data.
Fixed Asset Turnover RatioPoorInventory Turnover RatioPoorReceivables Turnover RatioPoorDays Sales in Inventory RatioExcellentReceivable DaysExcellentCapital Turnover RatioPoor| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 3.87 | 3.59 | 3.75 | 2.94 | 1.6 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 28.84 | 14.98 | 17.13 | 13.39 | 20.67 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 12.66 | 24.37 | 21.31 | 27.26 | 17.66 |
| Receivable Days | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | -10.7 | 0.94 | 0.52 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
Coverage Score : 2.00The coverage ratios highlight difficulties in meeting interest and dividend obligations. The implication is that the company may struggle to cover its interest and dividend payments. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data. The company needs to improve its ability to cover its financial obligations.
Interest Coverage RatioPoorEquity Dividend Coverage RatioPoor| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 0.7 | 0.06 | -0.18 | -3.98 | -4.52 | -0.64 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
Solvency Score : 8.00The solvency position indicates strong debt management practices, it also reveals that the company is likely over-reliant on debt financing. This approach can offer tax advantages and potentially increase returns on equity. On the other hand, it escalates financial risk, especially if profits decline or interest rates rise. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data.
Debt RatioExcellentDebt to Equity RatioExcellentEquity RatioPoorDebt To Asset RatioExcellent| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 2.08 | 3.34 | -0.07 | -1.64 | -1.47 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | -1.93 | -1.43 | -0.07 | -0.62 | -0.6 |
| Equity Ratio | -1.08 | -2.34 | 1.07 | 2.64 | 2.47 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.11 | 1.93 | 2.08 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
Liquidity Score : 2.00The liquidity position reveals that the company may encounter difficulties in meeting its immediate obligations. The implication is that it might be hard to pay off short-term debts. It is essential to note that weighted average calculation gives more importance to the most recent data. The company needs to improve its ability to cover its short-term liabilities with its current assets.
Current RatioPoorQuick RatioPoorCash RatioPoorOperating Cash Flow RatioPoor| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLC Industries Ltd | 3.71 | N/A | N/A | -3.00 | -210.57 | -46.00 |
Weak ManagementThe management effectiveness of CLC Industries is weak due to sustained negative financial performance. Declining sales and profit growth, coupled with negative operating and net profit margins, indicate operational inefficiencies. High debt levels and poor ROCE further strain the company's financial health. The increase in promoter holding to 95% is a positive sign, it doesn't offset concerns about the company's ability to achieve sustainable profitability. Strategic and operational indicators also reveal inefficient working capital management.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 95.00% | Strong alignment with shareholders |
| CONS | Sales Growth (10Y) | -15% | Declining Sales Growth |
| Profit Growth (10Y) | 6% | Inconsistent profitability | |
| ROCE | -75.18 | Poor return on capital |
Financial Performance & GrowthPoorCapital Efficiency & ReturnsPoor
Financial Health & PrudenceWeakStrategic & Operational IndicatorsWeakFinancial Performance & Growth
CLC Industries exhibits a concerning trend of declining financial performance. The compounded sales growth has been negative across 10-year, 5-year, and 3-year periods. Similarly, the compounded profit growth is inconsistent, with a slight positive figure over 10 years but negative growth over shorter durations. Operating Profit Margin (OPM) and Net Profit Margin (NPM) are also negative, indicating operational inefficiencies and poor profitability. The company's reliance on other income to offset losses from core operations raises sustainability concerns.
| Metric | 2008-2010 | 2011-2013 | 2014-2016 | 2017-2019 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | -3.2% | 0.56% | -12.21% | -43.22% | -49% |
| Operating Profit (%) | -3.33% | 3% | 0.67% | -12.67% | -67% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Capital efficiency and returns for CLC Industries are notably weak. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is negative, indicating that the company is not generating profits from its capital investments. The Return on Equity (ROE) is also zero, suggesting that shareholder funds are not yielding returns. Asset turnover is not effectively converting assets into revenue. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) fluctuates but generally indicates inefficient working capital management.
| Metric | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 5% | -11% | 0% | 8% | -17% | 5% |
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health of CLC Industries is precarious. The company has high levels of borrowings, and the debt-to-equity ratio reflects significant leverage. Interest coverage is inadequate, as operating profit struggles to cover interest expenses. The company does not pay dividends, indicating a lack of distributable profits. The Enterprise Value (EV) is significantly influenced by debt, highlighting potential risks associated with its capital structure.
| Metric | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (₹ Cr) | 1,039 | 1,086 | 1,000 | 944 | 1,005 | 1,028 |
Strategic & Operational Indicators
Strategic and operational indicators suggest inefficiencies in CLC Industries' operations. Working capital management is poor, as indicated by fluctuating yet extended debtor and inventory days. Fixed asset management is questionable, with significant depreciation relative to the gross block, suggesting potential asset impairment or underutilization. These factors collectively point to operational challenges and strategic missteps.
| Metric | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 37 | 25 | 19 | 15 | 25 | 20 |
| Inventory Days | 131 | 69 | 59 | 84 | 49 | 69 |
Weak RiskCLC Industries faces a high level of risk due to its poor financial performance, high debt, and inefficient operations. The company's negative profitability, declining sales, and inability to generate returns on capital raise significant concerns about its solvency and long-term viability. Inefficient working capital management and high debt levels exacerbate these risks, making it difficult for the company to sustain operations or attract investment. The increased promoter holding does not offset these substantial financial and operational risks.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantificationWeakContingent liability evaluationWeakAccounting quality red flagsWeakOff-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Accounting quality red flags
There is no specific data available on accounting quality red flags.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe