Growth Ratio Summary

Growth Score : 4.00

The growth ratios present a mixed view of the company's performance. While the Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth indicates substantial improvement, other growth metrics are at their lowest possible values. This suggests that the company is struggling to achieve consistent growth across all areas. The high EPS growth could be an anomaly, not indicative of sustainable performance.

Financial Ratio Summary

Financial Score : 3.60

The financial ratios highlight significant challenges in key financial metrics. The low values for EPS, cash EPS, and book value per share indicate poor profitability and shareholder value. While capital expenditures show a relatively better position it is not enough to offset the other financial difficulties.

Profitability Ratio Summary

Profitability Score : 2.00

The profitability ratios reflect significant challenges in generating profits. Gross profit margin, ROCE, ROE, ROA, operating margin, and net margin are all at their lowest possible values, signifying poor performance across all key profitability metrics. The company struggles to convert sales into profits and generate returns on its investments.

Efficiency Ratio Summary

Efficiency Score : 4.67

The efficiency ratios presents a concerning picture of the company's operational effectiveness. The turnover ratios are at their lowest, indicating poor asset utilization. While Days Sales in Inventory and Receivable Days are high, this reflects inefficiencies in managing inventory and collecting receivables. The values suggest operational inefficiencies across the board, negatively impacting the company's ability to generate revenue from its assets.

Coverage Ratio Summary

Coverage Score : 2.00

The coverage ratios indicate a concerning inability to cover interest and dividend payments. The lowest values across both metrics highlight significant financial stress and potential difficulties in meeting financial obligations. Improving earnings and managing debt are crucial for enhancing coverage ratios and ensuring financial stability.

Solvency Ratio Summary

Solvency Score : 8.40

The solvency ratios present a mixed picture. While debt-related ratios show a seemingly strong position due to negative debt values, this situation is unsustainable. The equity ratio appears high, but this is a consequence of the negative debt. The high debt to asset ratio indicates high leverage, which could be risky. While the negative debt ratios suggest a strong equity position, the high debt to asset ratio raises concerns about the company's long-term financial health.

Liquidity Ratio Summary

Liquidity Score : 2.00

The liquidity position is weak, suggesting difficulty in meeting short-term obligations. All liquidity ratios are at their lowest possible values. This indicates that the company might struggle to pay its immediate liabilities using its current assets. Low scores across all metrics highlight significant challenges in maintaining sufficient liquid assets, impacting its operational flexibility and increasing financial risk.