Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd
Banking And Finance | Small Cap
Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd, operating in the non-bank financial sector, exhibits a mixed financial performance. While showing strengths in solvency and some aspects of efficiency, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, financial metrics, and profitability. The company's high solvency, driven by debt management, is contrasted by its poor liquidity ratios, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. Efficiency is a mixed bag, with good performance in managing inventory and receivables, but struggles in other areas. The absence of growth and low coverage ratios raise concerns about its sustainability and ability to meet financial obligations. Improvement in profitability and focus on growth initiatives are essential for long-term viability. The company's overall financial health requires considerable attention to address its weaknesses and capitalize on its strengths.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsHighly Undervalued
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd, operating in the non-bank financial sector, exhibits a mixed financial performance. While showing strengths in solvency and some aspects of efficiency, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, financial metrics, and profitability. The company's high solvency, driven by debt management, is contrasted by its poor liquidity ratios, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. Efficiency is a mixed bag, with good performance in managing inventory and receivables, but struggles in other areas. The absence of growth and low coverage ratios raise concerns about its sustainability and ability to meet financial obligations. Improvement in profitability and focus on growth initiatives are essential for long-term viability. The company's overall financial health requires considerable attention to address its weaknesses and capitalize on its strengths.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
N/A
Industry Median
14.83
Small Cap Median
14.16
P/E RATIO
-47.75
P/B RATIO
-2.13
Industry Median
1.20
Small Cap Median
1.19
P/S RATIO
221.83
Industry Median
3.23
Small Cap Median
3.77
Others
PEG RATIO
2.32
EV/EBITDA RATIO
-101.13
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹5.73 as on Apr 20, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
Quarterly Report⬤30th Apr 26
Audited Financial Results for the Quarter and Year Ended March 31, 2026
UNDEFINED SENTIMENT
The company's growth metrics indicate significant challenges in expanding its revenue, operating profit, and overall earnings. The low values suggest stagnation or contraction in key areas of the business. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the company's long-term sustainability and competitiveness. Focus on innovation and market expansion may be necessary.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 150 | -40 | -8.33 | -27.27 | -12.5 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -135.29 | -516.67 | 56 | -28.21 | 7.14 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -114.29 | -500 | 75 | 57.14 | 9.09 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 2.31 | 3.76 | -16.67 | 474.78 | 24.05 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -121.05 | -400 | 66.67 | 45 | 10.34 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial metrics present challenges in key areas such as earnings per share and book value. While capital expenditures are managed effectively, the low EPS and book value metrics raise concerns about overall financial performance. Improving these metrics is crucial for enhancing investor confidence and driving long-term value creation.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 0.01 | -0.11 | -0.12 | -0.11 | -0.12 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 0.02 | -0.03 | -0.06 | -0.1 | -0.11 |
| Book Value Per Share | -7.99 | -8.04 | -8.11 | -3.25 | -2.68 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios reveal a concerning lack of profitability across various metrics. The low values indicate that the business is struggling to generate profits from its sales, operations, and assets. Addressing these issues is critical for ensuring the company's financial health and long-term sustainability. Focus on cost management and revenue enhancement may be necessary.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 20 | -241.67 | -381.82 | -375 | -457.14 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -0.77 | 1.75 | 2.83 | -4.54 | -4.61 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | |||||
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 4.51 | -18.12 | -33.91 | -4.24 | -3.66 |
| Operating Margin | 30 | -208.33 | -354.55 | -350 | -428.57 |
| Net Margin | 20 | -100 | -181.82 | -362.5 | -457.14 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency in managing its operations is a mix of strengths and weaknesses. While demonstrating efficiency in managing inventory and receivables, the business faces challenges in leveraging its fixed assets and capital. This suggests opportunities for improvement in asset utilization and overall operational effectiveness. Focus on optimizing these areas could improve profitability and resource management.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 1.68 | 3.04 | 4.82 | 6.91 | N/A |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | |||||
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 217.26 | 120.07 | 75.73 | 52.82 | N/A |
| Receivable Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios suggest potential difficulties in meeting its interest and dividend obligations. The low values indicate a need to improve earnings and cash flow to ensure financial stability. Strengthening these ratios will be essential for maintaining investor confidence and avoiding financial distress.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency position presents a contrasting picture, indicating a strong ability to meet its long-term obligations. The approach to managing debt levels reflects a conservative financial strategy. While this provides stability, it may also limit the company's ability to leverage debt for growth and investment opportunities.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | -2.35 | -2.19 | -2.12 | 2.43 | 1.95 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | -0.7 | -0.69 | -0.68 | -1.7 | -2.05 |
| Equity Ratio | 3.35 | 3.19 | 3.12 | -1.43 | -0.95 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 11.47 | 10.87 | 13.04 | 2.27 | 1.83 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position reveals challenges in meeting its short-term obligations. The very low values suggest potential difficulties in covering immediate liabilities with its current assets. While maintaining low liquidity can sometimes free up capital for investments, the current levels may indicate significant financial stress. A cautious approach is necessary to ensure smooth operations and prevent liquidity crises.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 1.3 | 0.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.3 | 0.92 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.39 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.02 | 0.01 | -0.04 | -0.66 | -0.69 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DCM Financial Services Ltd | 4.17 | -15.09 | Neutral | -2.04 | -0.53 | -1.19 |
| 2 | Williamson Magor & Company Ltd | 3.80 | -0.16 | Highly Undervalued | -273.00 | -165.56 | -181.00 |
| 3 | Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd | 3.63 | -47.75 | Highly Undervalued | -0.30 | 0.02 | -0.32 |
| 4 | TCI Finance Ltd | 3.63 | 6.59 | Neutral | N/A | -1.39 | 4.94 |
The management effectiveness of Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. is weak due to poor financial performance, capital inefficiency, and a concerning ownership structure. Inconsistent sales and profit growth, negative operating profit margins, and negative returns on equity raise concerns about management's ability to generate sustainable value. The lack of institutional investor interest and the negative book value further highlight these challenges.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONS | Sales Growth | -20% (10-year CAGR) | Demonstrates long-term revenue decline. |
| Operating Profit Margin | Negative | Indicates operational inefficiencies and inability to generate profit. | |
| Institutional Holding | Near 0% | Raises concerns about confidence from sophisticated investors. |
Financial Performance & Growth
Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. exhibits poor financial performance and growth. Sales have been inconsistent, with a negative compounded sales growth across 10 years (-20%), 5 years (-3%), and 3 years (-16%). The Operating Profit Margin (OPM) has been consistently negative, and net profit has also been negative, indicating the company's struggle to achieve profitability. This data suggests underlying issues in financial management and operational effectiveness.
| Metric | 2007-2010 | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | 73.30% | -15.72% | -19.38% |
| Profit Growth (%) | - | - | - |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Capital efficiency and returns for Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. are poor. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is negative at -4.61% as of March 2018. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) is highly erratic, with significant fluctuations indicating inefficient working capital management. This suggests serious deficiencies in how the company utilizes its capital and generates returns.
| Metric | 2007-2010 | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | NA | NA | -4.61% |
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health and prudence of Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. are concerning. The company has borrowings, but the Debt/Equity ratio cannot be reliably assessed due to negative equity. The company does not have a dividend payout, and the balance sheet shows a negative book value. These factors indicate weak financial stability and a lack of shareholder returns.
| Metric | 2007-2010 | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Payout % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd.'s shareholding and ownership structure reveals a mixed picture. Promoter holding is stable at 45.67% from March 2017 to March 2025, indicating consistent promoter confidence. However, Institutional Holding by FIIs and DIIs is negligible, remaining close to 0% over the same period, suggesting a lack of interest from institutional investors. This raises concerns about the company's attractiveness to major investors.
| Metric | 2017-2019 | 2020-2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding (%) | 45.67% | 45.67% | 45.67% | 45.67% | 45.67% |
The overall risk assessment for Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. is high due to its poor financial performance, inefficient capital management, and weak financial health. Negative profit margins, inconsistent sales growth, and negative ROCE indicate significant operational and financial challenges. The absence of institutional investor interest further exacerbates the risk profile. The negative book value and poor returns on equity underscore the company's vulnerability.
Accounting quality red flags
The persistent negative profit margins and inconsistent cash flows raise concerns about the reliability of reported financial data. These inconsistencies suggest potential issues with revenue recognition, expense management, or asset valuation, warranting heightened scrutiny of the company's accounting practices.
Segment performance volatility
Instability can stem from fluctuating interest rates, credit defaults, and shifts in regulatory requirements. Such volatility might cause unpredictable earnings and affect investor confidence.
Regulatory compliance cost trends
It is essential to consider how increasing compliance costs may impact the company's financial performance.
Contingent liability evaluation
An evaluation of contingent liabilities is important to assess potential financial risks.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe