Karma Energy Ltd
Utilities | Small Cap
Karma Energy Ltd, operating in the Power & Utilities sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows some strengths in managing its debt and converting inventory and receivables efficiently. However, it struggles with liquidity, revenue and profit growth, and overall profitability. While the company has a high Earnings Per Share growth, this is contrasted by negative growth rates in revenue, operating profit, assets and net income. Its ability to cover interest and dividends is also poor, alongside weak earnings per share and book value. On a positive note, the company has a good operating margin and manages its capital expenditures well. Overall, Karma Energy needs to address its liquidity and profitability concerns to ensure long-term financial stability.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio4.00
- Financial Ratio4.00
- Profitability Ratio3.20
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.40
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Karma Energy Ltd, operating in the Power & Utilities sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows some strengths in managing its debt and converting inventory and receivables efficiently. However, it struggles with liquidity, revenue and profit growth, and overall profitability. While the company has a high Earnings Per Share growth, this is contrasted by negative growth rates in revenue, operating profit, assets and net income. Its ability to cover interest and dividends is also poor, alongside weak earnings per share and book value. On a positive note, the company has a good operating margin and manages its capital expenditures well. Overall, Karma Energy needs to address its liquidity and profitability concerns to ensure long-term financial stability.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
92.96
Industry Median
16.74
Small Cap Median
17.70
P/E RATIO
-32.54
P/B RATIO
1.75
Industry Median
2.41
Small Cap Median
2.28
P/S RATIO
1.67
Industry Median
1.86
Small Cap Median
1.67
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
5.95
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹45.55 as on Jun 15, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth ratios present a mixed picture. While the Earnings per share growth rate is very high, revenue, operating profit, assets and net income growth rates are low. This suggests that although the company has grown its earning per share, it has not grown its revenue, assets, operating profit and net income and company has to focus on these things. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the need for more balanced growth across all areas.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 23.54 | -13.9 | 20.69 | -39.64 | 25.24 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -9.98 | -47.61 | 108.01 | -109.71 | -754.76 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | 2914.29 | 309 | -97.22 | 4679.17 | -87.79 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 6.35 | -20.35 | -2.82 | -16 | -46.85 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 76.67 | 210.51 | -101.39 | -8393.75 | -87.79 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios present a mixed performance. While capital expenditures is good, adjusted earnings per share, cash earnings per share, and book value per share are low, dividend per share is zero. This suggests that the company has made less profit from its shares but invested well on capital expenditure. The weighted average calculation highlights the need for improved overall financial management.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -4.06 | -6.48 | 0.14 | -11.44 | -1.4 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 2.2 | -4.61 | 5.84 | -5.99 | 3.86 |
| Book Value Per Share | 70.31 | 35.65 | 22.8 | 8.53 | 26.04 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios indicate that company's operating margin is good but gross profit margin, return on capital employed, return on equity, return on assets, and net margin are all low. This suggests challenges in generating profits from its sales and assets. While the operating margin indicates efficient cost management, the overall profitability needs improvement. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the need for strategic initiatives to enhance profitability.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 14.02 | 0.2 | 15.19 | -29.98 | 6.79 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 3.84 | 1.75 | 5.95 | -6.22 | 4.07 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -4.55 | -27.86 | 0.6 | -134.18 | -5.36 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 6.49 | 4.27 | 9.14 | -1.06 | 13.01 |
| Operating Margin | 29.55 | 17.98 | 30.99 | -4.98 | 26.06 |
| Net Margin | -9.21 | -33.2 | 0.38 | -52.49 | -5.12 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While the number of days it takes to convert inventory into sales and collect receivables is excellent, the turnover ratios for fixed assets, inventory, receivables, and capital are poor. This indicates efficient working capital management but inefficient use of assets to generate revenue. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the need to improve asset utilization.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.98 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 6.81 | 8.67 | 13.01 | 12.19 | 11.73 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 2.34 | 3.67 | 3.1 | 2.16 | 3.79 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 53.6 | 42.1 | 28.06 | 29.94 | 31.12 |
| Receivable Days | 155.98 | 99.46 | 117.74 | 168.98 | 96.31 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.73 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios indicate a limited ability to meet its interest and dividend obligations. Both the interest coverage ratio and the equity dividend coverage ratio are quite low. This suggests potential difficulties in managing its financial obligations. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the need for enhanced financial stability.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 0.77 | -0.53 | 1.02 | -0.99 | 0.64 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency ratios present a contrasting picture. While demonstrating a strong ability to manage debt, as indicated by debt ratio and debt-to-asset ratio, the equity ratio suggests that the company's assets are not primarily funded by equity. This can create a risk if profitability falters. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the company's current state, highlighting the importance of maintaining a balanced capital structure.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.3 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.75 | 1.17 | 1.33 | 1.86 | 0.43 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.7 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.2 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position reveals challenges in meeting its short-term obligations. While the operating cash flow ratio suggests some ability to generate cash from operations, the current, quick, and cash ratios indicate difficulties in covering current liabilities with liquid assets. This may pose risks in managing day-to-day expenses and unexpected financial needs. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent performance, highlights the need for improved short-term financial management.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 1.44 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.4 | 0.23 | 1.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.54 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.1 | 0.12 | -0.05 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agni Green Power Ltd. | 6.42 | 58.28 | Neutral | 3.87 | 0.43 | 0.84 |
| 2 | Karma Energy Ltd | 4.53 | -32.54 | Neutral | 8.25 | 0.91 | -1.62 |
The management effectiveness of Karma Energy Ltd. shows a mixed performance. Stable promoter holding indicates aligned interests with shareholders. However, the company has demonstrated inconsistent profitability and revenue growth over the years. The company's ROCE and ROE are very low, highlighting concerns about capital efficiency. Overall, the management faces challenges in improving financial performance and capital efficiency but maintains a stable ownership structure.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 74.70% | Stable promoter confidence |
| CONS | Return on Equity | -8% | Poor return to shareholders |
| ROCE | 0.21 | Inefficient use of capital | |
| Profit Growth | 19% | Profit expansion is unsustainable |
Financial Performance & Growth
Karma Energy Ltd. demonstrates inconsistent financial performance. The compounded sales growth shows a fluctuating trend over different periods. While the TTM sales growth is 25%, the 5-year and 3-year sales growth are -1% and -3%, respectively. The quarterly sales and profit figures reveal volatility. The OPM % fluctuates significantly, indicating instability in operational efficiency. This inconsistent performance raises concerns about the sustainability of the company's financial health.
| Metric | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 | 2019-2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | 12.21% | 9.06% | 7.22% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Karma Energy exhibits poor capital efficiency and returns. The current ROCE is a mere 0.21%, and ROE is 0.32%, indicating ineffective utilization of capital and shareholder funds. Historical Return on Equity (ROE) has been negative, averaging at -10% over 10 years, -11% over 5 years and -20% over 3 years. The recent ROE -8% indicates continued inefficiency in generating returns from equity. This poor capital efficiency and negative returns could deter investors and limit the company's growth potential.
| Metric | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 | 2019-2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 3.42% | 2.62% | 1.76% |
| ROE (%) | - | - | - |
Financial Health & Prudence
Karma Energy's Debt/Equity ratio is not available, indicating a lack of clear data for assessing leverage. The interest coverage ratio cannot be calculated due to negative profit before tax figures in recent years, suggesting potential difficulties in covering interest obligations. The company has not been paying dividends, as indicated by a 0.00% dividend payout ratio over the past several years. This lack of dividend payments may not appeal to income-seeking investors, potentially affecting investor confidence. Overall, there are mixed indicators regarding the company's financial health, with debt management and interest coverage being areas of concern.
| Metric | 2011-2014 | 2015-2018 | 2019-2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | - | - | - |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
Karma Energy Ltd. benefits from a consistently high promoter holding. Over the past several years, the promoter holding has remained stable at 74.70% indicating strong confidence from the company's leadership and alignment with shareholder interests. This substantial promoter holding can be seen as a positive sign, reflecting long-term commitment and stability in the company's direction.
| Metric | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | 2023 | 2025 | |---|---|---|---|---| |Promoter Holding (%)| 74.71 | 74.70 | 74.70 | 74.70 | 74.70 |
Karma Energy Ltd. exhibits a moderate risk profile. The absence of off-balance sheet exposure data limits complete assessment. Fluctuations in quarterly sales and profit indicate segment performance volatility, while the absence of data prevents evaluating foreign exchange or interest rate exposure. Despite these concerns, the stable promoter holding provides a degree of assurance. Overall, the company's risk is moderate due to inconsistent financial performance and lack of comprehensive risk-related data.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Segment performance volatility
Karma Energy Ltd. experiences noticeable segment performance volatility, as indicated by fluctuations in quarterly sales and profit. For instance, YOY Sales Growth % varies significantly across quarters, ranging from -59.87% to 127.44%. Similarly, YOY Profit Growth % shows considerable fluctuation, with values ranging from -636% to 200%.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe