Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd
Fertilizers | Small Cap
Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd, operating in the Chemical & Petrochemicals sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company exhibits strong solvency, indicating a good ability to meet long-term obligations. Efficiency is average due to good inventory management and receivable collection. However, growth, coverage, and profitability are weak, suggesting challenges in expanding revenue, maintaining adequate interest and dividend coverage, and generating profits. Capital expenditure is high, reflecting significant investments in assets, but this has not yet translated into improved growth or profitability. Overall, the company needs to focus on improving its operational performance and profitability to achieve sustainable growth.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd, operating in the Chemical & Petrochemicals sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company exhibits strong solvency, indicating a good ability to meet long-term obligations. Efficiency is average due to good inventory management and receivable collection. However, growth, coverage, and profitability are weak, suggesting challenges in expanding revenue, maintaining adequate interest and dividend coverage, and generating profits. Capital expenditure is high, reflecting significant investments in assets, but this has not yet translated into improved growth or profitability. Overall, the company needs to focus on improving its operational performance and profitability to achieve sustainable growth.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
22.67
Industry Median
8.95
Small Cap Median
8.95
P/E RATIO
68.31
P/B RATIO
8.58
Industry Median
0.95
Small Cap Median
0.95
P/S RATIO
1.75
Industry Median
0.36
Small Cap Median
0.36
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
29.89
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹308.75 as on Feb 20, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth is weak. This suggests the company is not expanding its revenue, operating profit, EPS, assets, and net income effectively. The lack of growth across multiple metrics raises concerns about the company's competitive positioning and market strategy. Focus on innovation, market penetration, and strategic investments is needed to stimulate growth.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 26.71 | 20.79 | 49.15 | -15.51 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 23.64 | 19.12 | 20.99 | -4.08 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | N/A | 46.98 | -31.09 | 92.34 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 6.86 | 29.01 | 3.78 | -20.96 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 8 | 48.15 | -30 | 92.86 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company demonstrates average financial metrics. While capital expenditure is well-managed, adjusted EPS, cash EPS, book value per share, and dividend per share are low. This suggests the company is not effectively translating its investments into shareholder value. Improving earnings and optimizing capital allocation are crucial for enhancing overall financial performance.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 2.27 | 3.36 | 2.35 | 4.54 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 3.53 | 4.71 | 3.78 | 6.13 |
| Book Value Per Share | 29.24 | 31.34 | 32.69 | 35.88 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.7 | 0.99 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 26 | 37 | 33 | 74 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability is weak. Low gross profit, ROCE, ROE, ROA, operating margin, and net margin suggest the company is struggling to generate profits from its operations. Improving cost control, pricing strategies, and operational efficiency is crucial for enhancing profitability.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 3.87 | 3.93 | 3.28 | 3.59 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 7.21 | 6.44 | 6.75 | 16.85 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 7.76 | 10.72 | 7.2 | 12.65 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 8.09 | 7.47 | 8.7 | 10.56 |
| Operating Margin | 4.96 | 4.89 | 3.97 | 4.5 |
| Net Margin | 1.97 | 2.42 | 1.13 | 2.59 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company showcases average efficiency. While days sales in inventory and receivable days are well-managed, the fixed asset, inventory, and capital turnover ratios are low. This suggests the company is not effectively utilizing its assets to generate revenue. Optimizing asset utilization could significantly improve overall efficiency and profitability.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 4.55 | 5.36 | 7.67 | 5.8 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 9.27 | 10.17 | 13.97 | 12.05 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 39.37 | 35.89 | 26.13 | 30.29 |
| Receivable Days | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 1.71 | 1.46 | 2.08 | 3.32 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage is weak. Low interest and equity dividend coverage ratios suggest the company may struggle to meet its interest and dividend obligations. This can raise concerns among lenders and investors. Strengthening earnings and cash flow is essential to improve coverage ratios.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2006 | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 6.57 | 3.62 | 4.87 | 2.16 | 4.42 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | 3.57 | 3.85 | 5.56 | 3.33 | 4.55 |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company demonstrates strong solvency. The debt and debt to asset ratios suggest a conservative approach to leveraging assets. However, a very low equity ratio indicates that the company's operations are largely funded by debt rather than equity. While debt levels are well-managed, the company should aim to increase its equity base for a more balanced capital structure.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.51 | 0.19 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.67 | 1 | 1.04 | 0.23 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.49 | 0.81 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.11 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak. This suggests potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. Low current, quick, and cash ratios indicate that the company may struggle to convert assets into cash quickly to cover immediate liabilities. The operating cash flow ratio also being low further underscores these challenges. Monitoring and improving short-term financial health is essential.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2007 | Mar 2008 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 1.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 1.82 | 0.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.18 | -0.15 | 0.02 | 1.08 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd | 8.29 | 6.81 | Neutral | 300.00 | 9.14 | 211.00 |
| 2 | Krishana Phoschem Ltd | 8.17 | 22.84 | Highly Overvalued | 298.00 | 29.14 | 180.00 |
| 3 | Madhya Bharat Agro Products Ltd | 8.05 | 32.85 | Neutral | 227.00 | 17.14 | 150.00 |
| 4 | National Fertilizer Ltd | 5.55 | 18.06 | Neutral | 834.00 | 3.46 | 211.00 |
| 5 | Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd | 3.63 | 68.31 | Neutral | 94.00 | 12.13 | 54.00 |
The management of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd demonstrates a mix of strengths and weaknesses. A significant positive is the strong and stable promoter holding, which reflects confidence in the company's direction. Additionally, the Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is at a good level, indicating efficient use of capital. However, these strengths are countered by concerning trends such as declining sales growth and a negative cash conversion cycle, which suggests potential issues with working capital management.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 60.63% | Strong and Stable |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 16.78% | Good Level | |
| CONS | Compounded Sales Growth (TTM) | -16% | Declining Sales Growth |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | Negative | Indicates inefficiency in working capital management |
Financial Performance & Growth
Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd shows a mixed trend in financial performance. While compounded profit growth has been positive over the last three years, sales growth is declining.
| Metric | 3 Years | TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Compounded Sales Growth | 15% | -16% |
| Compounded Profit Growth | 28% | 50% |
The negative sales growth in the TTM period raises concerns about the company's ability to sustain revenue.
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd are moderate. The ROCE is at a good level of 16.78% and ROE is at 17.77%. The Cash Conversion Cycle is negative, indicating that the company receives payment from its customers before it needs to pay its suppliers, which could also point to aggressive payment terms that might strain supplier relationships.
Financial Health & Prudence
Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd consistently shares profits through dividends, with a dividend yield of 0.55%.
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding and ownership structure of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd presents a positive outlook. The promoter holding is strong and stable at 60.63%. Institutional holding shows FII at 2.12% and DII at 6.71%. This indicates a reasonable level of confidence from both internal and external investors.
| Metric | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 60.63% | 60.63% | 60.63% |
| FII Holding | 0.86% | 1.84% | 2.12% |
| DII Holding | 0.19% | 2.00% | 6.71% |
The risk assessment for Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd suggests a moderate level of concern. While the promoter holding is stable, reliance on other income raises concerns.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Segment performance volatility
There is no specific data available on segment performance volatility.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe