Namo eWaste Management Ltd
Commercial Services & Supplies | Small Cap
Namo eWaste Management Ltd, operating within the Power & Utilities sector, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strengths in solvency, growth, coverage, and profitability, indicating a solid foundation and potential for expansion. However, liquidity and efficiency pose significant concerns, suggesting challenges in managing short-term obligations and operational effectiveness. While revenue and asset growth are robust, certain financial metrics like EPS growth and net income growth need attention. Overall, the company's financial health could be improved by addressing liquidity and efficiency issues, while leveraging its growth and solvency strengths for sustainable development. There are good solvency, growth, coverage, and profitability and bad liquidity and efficiency.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio6.00
- Financial Ratio4.00
- Profitability Ratio7.20
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio6.80
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Namo eWaste Management Ltd, operating within the Power & Utilities sector, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strengths in solvency, growth, coverage, and profitability, indicating a solid foundation and potential for expansion. However, liquidity and efficiency pose significant concerns, suggesting challenges in managing short-term obligations and operational effectiveness. While revenue and asset growth are robust, certain financial metrics like EPS growth and net income growth need attention. Overall, the company's financial health could be improved by addressing liquidity and efficiency issues, while leveraging its growth and solvency strengths for sustainable development. There are good solvency, growth, coverage, and profitability and bad liquidity and efficiency.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
42.78
Industry Median
50.82
Small Cap Median
50.82
P/E RATIO
42.78
P/B RATIO
5.96
Industry Median
5.96
Small Cap Median
5.96
P/S RATIO
3.00
Industry Median
3.39
Small Cap Median
3.39
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
25.43
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹268.65 as on Jun 18, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company demonstrates strong growth in revenue and assets, but faces challenges in EPS and net income growth. This mixed performance suggests potential for future expansion if profitability can be improved. The company is growing in revenue and assets, but not in terms of profit.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 48.51 | 30 | |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 27.27 | 64.29 | |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -8.19 | 69.73 | |
| Asset Growth Rate | 60.32 | 17.82 | |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 14.29 | 75 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The financial ratios reveal a mixed performance. While capital expenditures are well-managed, adjusted EPS, book value per share, and dividend per share are concerning. Cash EPS is below average, indicating potential areas for improvement in earnings quality. The company needs to focus on improving the overall financial performance.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 4.12 | 3.48 | 6.09 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 4.71 | 3.91 | 6.96 |
| Book Value Per Share | 20.59 | 38.7 | 44.78 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0.9 | 13.6 | 12.5 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company demonstrates good profitability with strong gross profit margin, ROCE, and ROA, but struggles with ROE and net margin. This suggests effective core operations, but challenges in translating profits to equity holders. The company needs to improve its return on equity.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 9.9 | 8.67 | 10.77 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 26.2 | 19 | 21 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 20 | 8.99 | 13.59 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 17.46 | 13.86 | 19.33 |
| Operating Margin | 10.89 | 9.33 | 11.79 |
| Net Margin | 6.93 | 5.33 | 7.18 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While days sales in inventory and receivable days are well-managed, fixed asset and capital turnover ratios are low, indicating potential inefficiencies in asset utilization. The company needs to improve in asset management to increase efficiency.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 4.59 | 6 | 5.13 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 4.86 | 5.27 | 4.75 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 6.89 | 11.05 | 12.35 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 75.1 | 69.26 | 76.84 |
| Receivable Days | 53 | 33.03 | 29.55 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 2.65 | 1.65 | 1.86 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company exhibits a strong capacity to cover interest expenses, but lacks equity dividend coverage. This suggests a solid financial cushion for debt obligations, but no ability to cover dividend payments. The company is paying debts well, but not able to cover dividend payments.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 10 | 7 | 21 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company exhibits a strong solvency position, indicating a solid long-term financial structure. This suggests a low risk of financial distress and a strong ability to meet long-term obligations. This can be attributed to effective management of debt and equity. The company has a strong base to grow.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak. This suggests potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations as they come due. Lower liquidity can restrict the company's ability to invest in growth opportunities or handle unexpected expenses. This might be due to the nature of the eWaste management industry, where immediate cash conversion might be challenging. The company need to improve its short-term financial health.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.68 | 6.67 | 5.4 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.92 | 3.34 | 2.53 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 1.22 | 0.14 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.12 | -1.99 | 0.36 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Namo eWaste Management Ltd | 6.31 | 42.78 | Neutral | 23.00 | 6.28 | 14.00 |
The management effectiveness of Namo eWaste Management Ltd is mixed. Strong sales growth and significant promoter holding suggest confidence. Declining profitability metrics, such as OPM, and a lengthening cash conversion cycle indicate potential inefficiencies in working capital management. Addressing cost control and operational efficiency is essential alongside increasing sales.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Sales Growth TTM | 49% | Strong revenue expansion |
| Promoter Holding | 69.06% | High promoter confidence | |
| CONS | OPM % (Mar 2025) | 9% | Declining operating efficiency |
| Cash Conversion Cycle (Mar 2025) | 123 Days | Lengthening working capital cycle |
Financial Performance & Growth
Namo eWaste Management exhibits mixed financial performance. TTM sales growth stands at 49%, while the OPM % has declined from 11% in Mar 2024 to 9% in Mar 2025. Quarterly OPM % also shows a decreasing trend, from 13% in Sep 2023 to 8% in Mar 2025. Despite a compounded profit growth TTM of 23%, these declining profitability metrics suggest potential challenges in sustaining margins as the company scales.
| Metric | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth % | 48.82% | |
| OPM % | 11% | 9% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Namo eWaste Management's capital efficiency is reflected in its ROCE and ROE. The ROCE % for Mar 2025 is 19%. The Return on Equity (Last Year) is 14%. These figures suggest returns on capital and equity. Analyzing these metrics over a longer period would help determine if they are improving or declining. Further analysis of asset turnover and cash conversion cycle would give a more detailed understanding of capital efficiency.
Financial Health & Prudence
Namo eWaste Management's financial health presents a mixed scenario. Borrowings have decreased from ₹15 Cr in Mar 2024 to ₹3 Cr in Mar 2025. However, cash from operating activities is -₹10 Cr in Mar 2024 and -₹20 Cr in Mar 2025. This negative operating cash flow raises questions about the sustainability of the company's financial structure.
| Metric | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | ₹15 Cr | ₹3 Cr |
| Cash from Operating Activity | -₹10 Cr | -₹20 Cr |
Strategic & Operational Indicators
Strategic and operational indicators for Namo eWaste Management reveal issues. The Cash Conversion Cycle has lengthened from 102 days in Mar 2024 to 123 days in Mar 2025. Additionally, the Working Capital Days have increased from 96 days in Mar 2024 to 111 days in Mar 2025. These metrics indicate a need to improve operational efficiency and working capital management.
| Metric | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 102 Days | 123 Days |
| Working Capital Days | 96 Days | 111 Days |
Namo eWaste Management Ltd. faces moderate risk due to declining operating profit margin, negative cash flow from operations, and an increasing cash conversion cycle. The strong sales growth and promoter holding are positives, but the trends in profitability and cash management require attention. These factors suggest a need for improved operational efficiency and financial prudence.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Segment performance volatility
There is no specific data available on segment performance volatility.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe