PAE Ltd
| Small Cap
PAE Ltd, operating in the Automobiles & Auto Components sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strength in solvency and some aspects of efficiency, particularly in managing inventory and receivables. However, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, financial performance, and profitability, all of which are significantly below industry standards. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent performance, highlights these areas of concern. While capital expenditures appear well-managed, the overall financial health is hampered by poor performance in key areas such as earnings, margins, and asset utilization. Future success will depend on addressing these weaknesses and leveraging its strengths in solvency and operational efficiency.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation Metrics
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
PAE Ltd, operating in the Automobiles & Auto Components sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strength in solvency and some aspects of efficiency, particularly in managing inventory and receivables. However, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, financial performance, and profitability, all of which are significantly below industry standards. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent performance, highlights these areas of concern. While capital expenditures appear well-managed, the overall financial health is hampered by poor performance in key areas such as earnings, margins, and asset utilization. Future success will depend on addressing these weaknesses and leveraging its strengths in solvency and operational efficiency.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
P/B RATIO
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
P/S RATIO
N/A
Industry Median
N/A
Market Cap Median
N/A
Others
PEG RATIO
N/A
EV/EBITDA RATIO
N/A
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth metrics are generally weak, indicating limited expansion and potential stagnation. Low revenue, operating profit, EPS, asset, and net income growth rates suggest a need for strategic initiatives to stimulate growth. While temporary slowdowns can occur, the company needs to explore growth opportunities. The growth ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to develop and implement effective growth strategies.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -32.78 | -13.2 | -80.73 | -96 | -84.13 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 61 | -9.16 | 63.08 | -42.66 | -48.08 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | 9.06 | -22.63 | 111.94 | -103.82 | -361.68 |
| Asset Growth Rate | -5.45 | -6.06 | -60.81 | -58.58 | -24.75 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 9.04 | -19.16 | 122.04 | -103.83 | -360.71 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial metrics present a mixed picture. While capital expenditures are well-managed, adjusted EPS, cash EPS, book value per share, and DPS are low, indicating potential underperformance in key areas. While strategic investments can temporarily lower these metrics, there is a need to improve overall financial performance. The financial ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to optimize financial management for better results.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -17.14 | -13.29 | -28.1 | 1.08 | -2.81 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | -13.09 | -9.33 | -26.11 | 1.43 | -2.63 |
| Book Value Per Share | 3.86 | -9.13 | -36.89 | -36.24 | -39.24 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0.1 | 6.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability metrics are weak, indicating potential struggles in generating profits. Low gross profit margin, ROCE, ROE, ROA, operating margin, and net margin suggest a need for improved cost management and revenue generation. While external factors can influence profitability, the company needs to improve operational efficiency. The profitability ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to optimize cost management and revenue generation.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -10.92 | -11.95 | -73.71 | -926.98 | -3020 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -10.64 | -11.46 | -330.31 | -21.51 | 20.2 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -443.6 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | -7.69 | -7.44 | -30.94 | -42.83 | -29.55 |
| Operating Margin | -6.84 | -7.16 | -60.57 | -868.25 | -2840 |
| Net Margin | -17.29 | -16.1 | -185.52 | 177.78 | -2920 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While days sales in inventory and receivable days are well-managed, fixed asset, inventory, receivables, and capital turnover are low, indicating inefficient asset utilization. While streamlining operations can boost efficiency, the company needs to improve asset management. The efficiency ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to optimize asset utilization for better performance.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 2.23 | 2.35 | 2.68 | 0.12 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 9.79 | 13.56 | 5.71 | 2.29 | 3.53 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 5.07 | 3.3 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 37.28 | 26.92 | 63.92 | 159.39 | 103.4 |
| Receivable Days | 71.99 | 110.61 | 500 | 4055.56 | 2433.33 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 1.08 | 1.3 | 1.93 | -0.07 | -0.01 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting its interest and dividend obligations. Low interest and equity dividend coverage ratios suggest a need for improved earnings and cash flow. While external financing can bridge the gap, relying on it too heavily can increase financial risk. The coverage ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to strengthen both earnings and cash flow.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | -0.9 | -1.28 | -1.05 | -11.41 | 2.19 | -5.21 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency metrics present a mixed picture. While the debt and debt-to-asset ratios suggest a conservative approach to leverage, the low equity ratio indicates a potential over-reliance on debt financing. While moderate debt can fuel growth, a high debt burden can increase financial risk. The solvency ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights the need to balance debt and equity to ensure long-term financial stability.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.9 | 1.39 | -1.16 | -0.04 | 0 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 9 | -3.56 | -0.54 | -0.04 | 0 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.1 | -0.39 | 2.16 | 1.04 | 1 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.11 | 0 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting its short-term obligations. Low current, quick, and cash ratios suggest a limited ability to convert assets into cash quickly. While a conservative approach can preserve capital, the inability to readily cover short-term liabilities may lead to financial strain. The liquidity ratios have been calculated using a weighted average method that prioritizes recent data. This highlights an urgent need to improve its working capital management.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.1 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.1 | 0.08 | -0.03 | -0.07 | -0.07 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAE Ltd | 3.89 | N/A | N/A | -2.84 | -0.65 | -2.92 |
The management effectiveness of PAE Ltd is weak due to declining revenue, negative profit margins, and inconsistent financial health. The recent increase in promoter holding may aim to stabilize the company amid poor financials, rather than reflecting confidence in strong performance.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONS | Sales Growth | Negative | Declining revenue expansion |
| CONS | Profit Growth | Negative | Declining profitability |
| CONS | Operating Profit Margin | Negative | Poor operational efficiency |
| CONS | Promoter Holding (Previous) | 52.80% | Confidence and alignment with shareholders is low |
Financial Performance & Growth
PAE Ltd's financial performance indicates significant challenges with consistently negative Sales Growth % and OPM %. Net Profit has also been negative, reflecting the company's struggle to generate profits.
| Metric | Mar 2010–Mar 2012 | Mar 2013–Mar 2015 | Mar 2016–Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | -0.91% | -30.33% | -92.67% |
| OPM (%) | -0.38% | -5.68% | -1432.94% |
| Net Profit (₹ Cr) | -0.52% | -14.82% | -10.36% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Capital efficiency and returns metrics for PAE Ltd are concerning. ROCE and ROE data are unavailable, suggesting ineffective capital utilization. The absence of positive returns indicates potential challenges in attracting investors.
Financial Health & Prudence
PAE Ltd's financial health is weak due to continuous losses. The Debt/Equity Ratio cannot be reliably assessed due to negative book value, and the Interest Coverage Ratio cannot be determined due to negative operating profits. The company has not been paying dividends.
| Metric | 2010–2012 | 2013–2015 | 2016–2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (₹ Cr) | 30.05 | 48.83 | 30.11 |
| Dividend Payout % | 29.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
PAE Ltd shows a recent increase in promoter holding from approximately 52.80% to 95.00% between September 2024 and December 2024, while DII holding has decreased to 0.00%. This may reflect a strategic move by promoters to consolidate control.
| Metric | Sep 2022–Mar 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding (%) | 52.80 | 95.00 | 95.00 | 95.00 |
| DII Holding (%) | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The risk assessment for PAE Ltd is red, indicating high risk due to negative profitability, inconsistent revenue, and negative operating margins. The absence of critical financial ratios like ROCE and ROE emphasizes the elevated risk profile. Very high debtor and inventory days, coupled with extremely extended payable days, suggest severe liquidity challenges. The promoter holding has increased to 95% which could lead to delisting of the company as only 5% public holding is remaining.
Accounting quality red flags
Notable fluctuations in Other Income and the presence of Exceptional Items could indicate potential accounting quality concerns. In Mar 2016, Other Income was significantly negative at -₹15.31 Cr, whereas in Mar 2017, it was positive at ₹7.92 Cr. These fluctuations raise questions about the consistency and reliability of reported earnings.
Regulatory compliance cost trends
There is no specific data available on regulatory compliance cost trends.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe