RSWM Ltd
Textiles Apparels & Accessories | Small Cap
RSWM Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel industry, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company's solvency position appears strong, primarily driven by a solid equity base. Growth metrics are also notable, particularly in operating profit and EPS. However, the company faces challenges in liquidity and efficiency, which could hinder its short-term operational capabilities. Profitability is inconsistent, with a strong return on capital employed offset by low margins. While the company demonstrates potential for growth and maintains a stable equity position, there are areas needing attention to ensure sustained financial health.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio6.00
- Financial Ratio4.60
- Profitability Ratio4.40
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio3.20
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
RSWM Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel industry, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company's solvency position appears strong, primarily driven by a solid equity base. Growth metrics are also notable, particularly in operating profit and EPS. However, the company faces challenges in liquidity and efficiency, which could hinder its short-term operational capabilities. Profitability is inconsistent, with a strong return on capital employed offset by low margins. While the company demonstrates potential for growth and maintains a stable equity position, there are areas needing attention to ensure sustained financial health.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
17.49
Industry Median
18.86
Small Cap Median
18.86
P/E RATIO
17.49
P/B RATIO
0.67
Industry Median
1.69
Small Cap Median
1.69
P/S RATIO
0.17
Industry Median
0.86
Small Cap Median
0.86
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
4.47
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹193.12 as on Jun 17, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth ratios are mixed. While operating profit growth and EPS growth are significantly strong, revenue and net income growth are poor. The asset growth rate is good, indicating expansion. The high volatility in growth rates suggests potential instability and the need for a more balanced approach to growth management.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 64.1 | -0.73 | 7.1 | 18.93 | -5.64 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 146.86 | -42.59 | -61.69 | 120 | 35.41 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | 1082.81 | -50.11 | -117.14 | 90.16 | -229.88 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 24.41 | 12.28 | 27.82 | -2.25 | 0.17 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 1071.43 | -50 | -117.07 | 90.48 | -230 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios indicate mixed performance. While capital expenditures are well-managed, adjusted EPS, cash EPS, book value per share, and dividend per share are low. This suggests challenges in generating consistent earnings and shareholder value. Improving these metrics is essential for enhancing the company's overall financial health and attracting investors.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 100.42 | 20.85 | -20.85 | -8.72 | 13.19 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 149.58 | 53.19 | 28.09 | 25.74 | 43.83 |
| Book Value Per Share | 431.67 | 280.21 | 275.96 | 275.96 | 289.57 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 12.55 | 4.96 | 5.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 329 | 245 | 221 | 123 | 145 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios are varied. While return on capital employed is strong, gross profit margin, return on equity, operating margin, and net margin are poor. Return on assets is average. This indicates that while the company is efficient in using its capital, it struggles with overall profitability and margin management. Enhancing these margins is critical for sustained financial performance.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 8.36 | 3.19 | -1.43 | 0.99 | 2.83 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 18 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 23.75 | 9.34 | -1.62 | -3.08 | 3.82 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 16.78 | 8.58 | 2.57 | 5.79 | 7.82 |
| Operating Margin | 11.32 | 6.55 | 2.34 | 4.33 | 6.21 |
| Net Margin | 6.44 | 3.25 | -0.52 | -0.83 | 1.14 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While days sales in inventory and receivable days are well-managed, the turnover ratios for fixed assets, inventory, receivables, and capital are low. This suggests potential inefficiencies in asset utilization and working capital management. Enhancing these turnover ratios could improve overall operational efficiency and profitability.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 4.05 | 3.4 | 2.58 | 3.12 | 2.98 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 7.3 | 6.19 | 5.54 | 6.21 | 6.56 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 8.34 | 7.65 | 7.38 | 7.2 | 6.86 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 50 | 58.97 | 65.88 | 58.78 | 55.64 |
| Receivable Days | 43.76 | 47.71 | 49.46 | 50.69 | 53.21 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 2.55 | 2.08 | 1.97 | 2.51 | 2.24 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are marginal, with a low interest coverage ratio and a poor equity dividend coverage ratio. This suggests potential challenges in meeting interest obligations and limited ability to provide dividends to shareholders. Improving these ratios is crucial for maintaining financial stability and investor confidence. This highlights a need to strengthen earnings and manage debt effectively.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 5.26 | 3.05 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 1.35 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | 4.17 | 5.26 |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency position is strong, characterized by a high equity ratio and low debt ratios. This suggests a conservative capital structure and a lower risk of financial distress. While a high equity ratio indicates financial stability, it may also reflect missed opportunities for leveraging debt to enhance returns. Maintaining this balance is critical for long-term financial health.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. Low current, quick, and cash ratios suggest limited liquid assets. While this could be a result of efficient cash management, it may also point to a higher risk of financial distress if immediate liabilities cannot be covered. Monitoring and improving these ratios are essential for ensuring smooth operations and financial stability.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.26 | 1.38 | 1.13 | 1.04 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.6 | 0.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.2 | 0.08 | -0.05 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd | 8.07 | 13.43 | Undervalued | 114.00 | 125.00 | 72.00 |
| 2 | Orbit Exports Ltd | 7.86 | 17.64 | Neutral | 50.00 | 11.75 | 33.00 |
| 3 | Century Enka Ltd | 7.49 | 11.37 | Undervalued | 147.00 | 46.54 | 101.00 |
| 4 | Iris Clothings Ltd | 7.11 | 46.95 | Highly Overvalued | 29.00 | 0.85 | 16.00 |
| 5 | Filatex Fashions Ltd | 7.06 | 24.00 | Neutral | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| 6 | Ginni Filaments Ltd | 6.95 | 80.43 | Highly Overvalued | 67.00 | 4.78 | 37.00 |
| 7 | Nandan Denim Ltd | 6.88 | 11.35 | Neutral | 90.00 | 0.23 | 33.00 |
| 8 | Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd | 6.76 | -61.46 | Neutral | 39.00 | 3.14 | -13.00 |
| 9 | Precot Ltd | 6.38 | 25.21 | Overvalued | 113.00 | 29.87 | 36.00 |
| 10 | Ashima Ltd | 6.17 | -14.95 | Neutral | -7.00 | -0.31 | -20.00 |
| 11 | Donear Industries Ltd | 6.14 | 10.86 | Undervalued | 88.00 | 8.36 | 43.00 |
| 12 | AB Cotspin India Ltd | 6.05 | 40.23 | Highly Overvalued | 40.00 | 6.04 | 13.00 |
| 13 | Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd | 5.86 | 10.07 | Neutral | 61.00 | 12.49 | 51.00 |
| 14 | Manomay Tex India Ltd | 5.81 | 17.85 | Neutral | 84.00 | 10.88 | 20.00 |
| 15 | Soma Textiles & Industries Ltd | 5.77 | 4.60 | Neutral | -1.46 | 2.97 | 9.82 |
| 16 | Swaraj Suiting Ltd | 5.77 | 12.14 | Highly Undervalued | 112.00 | 19.82 | 54.00 |
| 17 | Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd | 5.68 | 69.63 | Undervalued | 158.00 | 6.05 | 22.00 |
| 18 | AYM Syntex Ltd | 5.64 | 192.19 | Neutral | 93.00 | 1.12 | 7.00 |
| 19 | GHCL Textiles Ltd | 5.44 | 12.95 | Neutral | 140.00 | 7.36 | 70.00 |
| 20 | RSWM Ltd | 5.14 | 17.49 | Neutral | 283.00 | 11.04 | 52.00 |
| 21 | Sutlej Textiles and Industries Ltd | 4.44 | -7.24 | Neutral | 53.00 | -4.87 | -86.00 |
| 22 | Axita Cotton Ltd | 4.35 | 153.40 | Overvalued | 1.00 | 0.05 | 2.00 |
| 23 | Aarvee Denims & Exports Ltd | 3.71 | -8.09 | Neutral | 36.00 | 7.20 | -42.00 |
The management of RSWM Ltd. exhibits a mixed performance. While sales have shown consistent growth over the past years and promoter holding is strong, profitability is a concern, with negative profit in the most recent year and fluctuating OPM. High debt levels and inconsistent ROCE also impact overall financial health. These factors contribute to a neutral assessment of management effectiveness.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Compounded Sales Growth (5Y) | 12% | Strong revenue expansion |
| Promoter Holding (Mar 2025) | 55.69% | High promoter confidence | |
| CONS | Net Profit (Mar 2025) | -40 Cr | Declining profitability |
| Debt/Equity Ratio (Recent) | High | High leverage |
Financial Performance & Growth
RSWM Ltd. shows mixed performance in financial growth. Compounded sales growth has been positive, but profit growth has been inconsistent. The recent net profit is negative, reflecting potential operational inefficiencies or increased costs. The OPM has fluctuated widely, indicating instability in core operations. This inconsistent performance raises concerns about the sustainability of the company's financial health.
| Metric | 2014-2016 | 2017-2019 | 2020-2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | 14.47% | 0.1% | 18.7% | -0.7% | 7.1% | 19.0% |
| OPM (%) | 12.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 7% | 2% | 4% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns of RSWM Ltd. are weak. ROCE has declined significantly, indicating a decreased ability to generate returns from capital employed. ROE is also low, reflecting poor returns on shareholder funds. All these factors suggest that the company is not effectively utilizing its capital, leading to poor returns and potential financial strain.
| Metric | 2014-2016 | 2017-2019 | 2020-2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 15.7% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 8% | -0% | 3% |
Financial Health & Prudence
RSWM Ltd.'s financial health and prudence are concerning. The company has high debt levels, as indicated by its debt-to-equity ratio, increasing its financial risk. The interest coverage ratio is low, suggesting difficulty in covering interest obligations from its operating profit. Dividend payouts have been inconsistent, with no dividends paid in recent years, reflecting financial constraints. These factors indicate significant financial stress and a need for improved financial management.
| Metric | 2014-2016 | 2017-2019 | 2020-2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | High | High | High | High | High | High |
| Interest Coverage | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding and ownership structure of RSWM Ltd. present a positive aspect. The promoter holding is strong and has increased over the years, indicating confidence in the company's prospects. Institutional holding, although fluctuating, shows some interest from FIIs and DIIs. The public holding remains significant, suggesting a broad base of retail investors. Overall, the strong promoter holding provides stability, while the presence of institutional investors adds credibility to the ownership structure.
| Metric | Mar 2017 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding (%) | 50.91 | 52.88 | 53.16 | 55.54 | 55.69 |
| FII Holding (%) | 4.20 | 1.24 | 0.32 | 1.66 | 1.50 |
| DII Holding (%) | 9.87 | 7.66 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.45 |
RSWM Ltd. faces moderate risk due to inconsistent financial performance and high leverage. While sales have grown, profitability is weak, and the company's ability to cover interest expenses is strained. Working capital management is inefficient, as indicated by the extended cash conversion cycle. Although promoter holding is strong, the overall financial instability and operational inefficiencies raise concerns about the company's risk profile.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposures, which makes a complete risk evaluation difficult.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liabilities. This lack of information impacts the ability to comprehensively assess potential financial risks.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe