Semac Consultants Ltd
Industrials | Small Cap
Semac Consultants Ltd, operating in the Construction & Engineering sector, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strong solvency, indicating a low level of debt relative to its equity and assets. Liquidity is reasonable, suggesting an ability to meet short-term obligations, but there's room for improvement in managing current assets and liabilities. Efficiency metrics present a mixed picture, with high inventory turnover offset by slower receivables collection and capital turnover. Growth is a concern, as while revenue has grown, profitability and earnings have declined. Coverage ratios are weak, indicating challenges in meeting interest and dividend obligations. Profitability is also a significant area of concern, with negative margins and returns on capital, equity, and assets. Overall, the company's financial health is challenged by profitability and coverage issues, despite strengths in solvency and revenue growth. Industry-specific factors, such as project timelines and economic conditions, may affect these ratios, and the company should focus on improving its bottom-line performance to strengthen its overall financial position.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio4.80
- Financial Ratio3.80
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio6.00
- Coverage Ratio2.80
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio6.56
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Semac Consultants Ltd, operating in the Construction & Engineering sector, showcases a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strong solvency, indicating a low level of debt relative to its equity and assets. Liquidity is reasonable, suggesting an ability to meet short-term obligations, but there's room for improvement in managing current assets and liabilities. Efficiency metrics present a mixed picture, with high inventory turnover offset by slower receivables collection and capital turnover. Growth is a concern, as while revenue has grown, profitability and earnings have declined. Coverage ratios are weak, indicating challenges in meeting interest and dividend obligations. Profitability is also a significant area of concern, with negative margins and returns on capital, equity, and assets. Overall, the company's financial health is challenged by profitability and coverage issues, despite strengths in solvency and revenue growth. Industry-specific factors, such as project timelines and economic conditions, may affect these ratios, and the company should focus on improving its bottom-line performance to strengthen its overall financial position.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
184.27
Industry Median
9.06
Small Cap Median
8.20
P/E RATIO
-20.51
P/B RATIO
1.63
Industry Median
1.30
Small Cap Median
1.30
P/S RATIO
0.70
Industry Median
1.06
Small Cap Median
0.91
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
123.95
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹390.65 as on Jun 15, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth ratios present a conflicting picture. Revenue growth is strong, indicating successful expansion in sales. However, operating profit, EPS, and net income growth are all negative, suggesting that increased revenues are not translating into increased profitability. Asset growth is positive, but the lack of profitability raises concerns about the sustainability of this growth. The company needs to address its profitability issues to ensure long-term sustainable growth.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -39.39 | 306.25 | -60.92 | 36.22 | 40.46 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -100 | -234.62 | -88.57 | -300 | |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -57.48 | 726.68 | -276.2 | -81.73 | -220.73 |
| Asset Growth Rate | -52.58 | 44.9 | -7.51 | 12.18 | -7.24 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 0 | 533.33 | -268.42 | -81.25 | -216.67 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios reveal a mixed financial performance. Adjusted and Cash Earnings Per Share are negative, reflecting profitability issues. Book Value Per Share is low, indicating limited equity value. No dividends were paid, suggesting a cautious approach to shareholder returns. However, capital expenditure is well-managed, reflecting efficient resource allocation. The company needs to address the profitability and shareholder return issues to enhance its financial standing.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 10 | 63.33 | -106.67 | -20 | 23.33 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 16.67 | 70 | -100 | -13.33 | 30 |
| Book Value Per Share | 316.67 | 376.67 | 263.33 | 246.67 | 273.33 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 4.74 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios are generally poor, suggesting significant challenges in generating profits. Gross Profit Margin, ROCE, ROE, ROA, Operating Margin, and Net Margin are all negative, indicating that the company is struggling to generate profits from its operations and investments. The company needs to address these profitability issues to ensure long-term financial sustainability.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -2.5 | 7.38 | -29.13 | -3.47 | 2.47 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 1 | 25 | -28 | -2 | 10 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 3.16 | 16.81 | -40.51 | -8.11 | 8.54 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0 | 12.21 | -17.77 | -1.81 | 3.9 |
| Operating Margin | 0 | 8 | -27.56 | -2.31 | 3.29 |
| Net Margin | 3.75 | 5.85 | -25.2 | -3.47 | 2.88 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency in managing its assets is a mix of strengths and weaknesses. Inventory turnover is very high, suggesting efficient inventory management. However, the receivables turnover is weak, indicating slower collection of revenues. The days sales in inventory are excellent, but the receivable days are slow. Capital turnover is also poor, reflecting inefficient use of capital. This suggests the company needs to balance its strengths in inventory management with improvements in receivables collection and capital utilization to enhance overall efficiency.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 4.21 | 14.13 | 5.77 | 8.24 | 12.15 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 3.57 | N/A | N/A | 179 | 118.5 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 1.82 | 9.15 | 2.85 | 4.22 | 5.72 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 102.24 | N/A | N/A | 2.04 | 3.08 |
| Receivable Days | 200.55 | 39.89 | 128.07 | 86.49 | 63.81 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.84 | 2.75 | 1.52 | 2.23 | 2.88 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting its interest and dividend obligations. The interest coverage ratio is negative, suggesting an inability to cover interest expenses with earnings. The equity dividend coverage ratio is also low, indicating limited ability to cover dividend payments. The company should address these coverage issues to ensure financial stability and investor confidence.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 3 | 28 | -15.5 | -0.17 | 2.4 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | 12.5 |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's strong solvency ratios reflect a very low level of debt relative to its equity and assets. This indicates a financially stable and secure position. The company has a solid capital structure, which reduces financial risk and provides a strong foundation for future growth.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is mixed. The quick ratio indicates a strong ability to meet short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Conversely, the operating cash flow ratio is poor, suggesting difficulties in generating cash from its operations to cover short-term liabilities. The current and cash ratios are average, indicating adequate but not exceptional liquidity. This suggests that while the company has liquid assets, its operational cash flow generation needs improvement to ensure it can comfortably meet its short-term obligations.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.15 | 1.9 | 1.52 | 1.4 | 1.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.15 | 1.9 | 1.52 | 1.39 | 1.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.49 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.37 | 0 | -0.17 | -0.02 | 0.2 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sonu Infratech Ltd | 6.76 | 4.17 | Neutral | 29.00 | 9.67 | 13.00 |
| 2 | Teerth Gopicon Ltd | 6.08 | 1.85 | Neutral | 25.00 | 10.70 | 13.00 |
| 3 | Semac Consultants Ltd | 5.58 | -20.51 | Neutral | 8.00 | 25.84 | 7.00 |
| 4 | RKEC Projects Ltd | 5.19 | 3.52 | Highly Undervalued | 51.00 | 8.35 | 20.00 |
| 5 | Tarmat Ltd | 5.17 | 21.03 | Undervalued | 7.00 | 2.62 | 6.00 |
| 6 | Bharat Road Network Ltd | 5.04 | -5.32 | Neutral | -24.00 | 0.41 | -59.00 |
| 7 | Sadbhav Infrastructure Projects Ltd | 4.73 | -5.09 | Neutral | 493.00 | 0.53 | 45.00 |
| 8 | ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd | 4.67 | 0.00 | Highly Undervalued | -13.00 | -4.18 | -8.00 |
| 9 | Sadbhav Engineering Ltd | 4.51 | 5.86 | Neutral | 531.00 | 0.78 | 95.00 |
| 10 | Gayatri Projects Ltd | 3.75 | -0.18 | Neutral | N/A | 44.09 | 2042.00 |
The management effectiveness of Semac Consultants Ltd. is rated 'Orange' due to inconsistent financial performance and concerns regarding capital efficiency. While sales have shown growth in some periods, evidenced by sales growth of 35.57% in 2025, profitability metrics and returns on capital are concerning. The significant decrease in promoter holding from 72.61% in March 2024 to 62.85% in March 2025 adds another layer of risk, indicating a potential lack of confidence from the promoters. Overall, the management's ability to navigate challenges and deliver consistent results needs improvement.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Sales Growth (2025) | 35.57% | Sales growth indicates potential market opportunities. |
| CONS | ROCE (2024) | -28% | Poor capital utilization. |
| Promoter Holding Change (YoY) | -9.76% | Decline in promoter confidence. |
Financial Performance & Growth
Semac Consultants exhibits inconsistent financial performance. While sales have fluctuated, there has been an increase in sales in Mar 2025. However, profitability metrics are concerning, with Operating Profit Margin (OPM) showing a significant decline. Quarterly results reveal volatile sales growth, including a 193% increase in Mar 2025, but also sharp declines in other quarters. The company's recent net profits are negative, indicating challenges in maintaining profitability. The inconsistency and recent negative trends raise concerns about the sustainability of the company's financial performance.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | 19.42% | 4.01% | -26.73% | 308.37% | -60.78% | 35.57% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns for Semac Consultants are weak. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is negative and has been declining. This indicates that the company is not effectively utilizing its capital to generate profits. While there was a ROCE of 25% in 2023, it dropped to -28% in 2024 and -2% in 2025. The negative Return on Equity (ROE) further confirms the underperformance in generating returns for shareholders. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) is also high, indicating inefficient working capital management. The company needs to address these inefficiencies to improve its financial performance.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 11.33% | 4.67% | 2% | 25% | -28% | -2% |
Financial Health & Prudence
Semac Consultants shows a mixed financial health profile. While the company has reduced its borrowings over the years, it has again increased in 2025. The company's dividend payout is inconsistent. This mixed financial health indicates that Semac Consultants needs to focus on sustainable profitability and prudent financial management.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 77.78 | 17.67 | 12.67 | 6 | 19 | 41 |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
Semac Consultants has experienced a notable decrease in promoter holding. The promoter holding has decreased from 72.61% in March 2024 to 62.85% in March 2025. This decline raises concerns about the alignment of management's interests with those of minority shareholders and could signal a lack of confidence from the promoters. The trend indicates a potential shift in the company's ownership dynamics. The FII holding is negligible, indicating limited institutional interest. The significant increase in public holding, corresponding to the decrease in promoter holding, further alters the ownership structure, which may increase stock volatility. This shift in shareholding patterns requires monitoring to understand its long-term implications.
| Metric | Mar 2023 | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 72.61% | 72.61% | 72.61% | 72.61% | 72.61% | 63.86% | 62.83% | 62.84% | 62.85% |
Semac Consultants faces significant risks, as indicated by negative ROCE and ROE values, coupled with fluctuating sales and declining profitability. The high cash conversion cycle indicates operational inefficiencies, while the substantial decrease in promoter holding raises concerns about confidence in the company's future.
Segment performance volatility
The available data indicates significant volatility in Semac Consultants' performance, as evidenced by fluctuations in quarterly sales and profit growth. The YOY Sales Growth % varies significantly, from -82% to 193%, highlighting instability in revenue generation. Similarly, YOY Profit Growth % shows extreme fluctuations, ranging from -2,058% to 105%. These wide swings suggest underlying issues in segment performance, possibly due to market conditions or internal operational challenges. This variability makes it difficult to predict future performance and increases the risk for investors.
Foreign exchange or interest rate exposure
Semac Consultants' interest payments have fluctuated over the years, indicating some exposure to interest rate risk. Although the amounts are not substantial, the variability could impact profitability, especially with recent negative profit trends.
| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest (Rs) | 12 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Accounting quality red flags
The company's negative profits raise concerns about the sustainability and reliability of its financial reporting. Although there are no specific accounting red flags, the inconsistency in profitability, coupled with negative ROCE and ROE, suggests the need for a cautious interpretation of the financial statements. Semac Consultants needs to demonstrate consistent and sustainable profitability to restore confidence in its accounting quality.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe