Shyam Telecom Ltd
Commercial Services & Supplies | Small Cap
Shyam Telecom Ltd, operating in the Financial Services (Non-Bank Finance) sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company's solvency is strong, indicating a good ability to meet long-term obligations. However, liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability are areas of significant concern. The company also faces challenges in efficiency, particularly in fixed asset, inventory, and capital turnover. High capital expenditure is a notable strength. Overall, the company's financial health is considered average, with potential risks in maintaining short-term obligations and generating profits. Future performance will depend on addressing these challenges and leveraging its capital expenditure.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Shyam Telecom Ltd, operating in the Financial Services (Non-Bank Finance) sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company's solvency is strong, indicating a good ability to meet long-term obligations. However, liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability are areas of significant concern. The company also faces challenges in efficiency, particularly in fixed asset, inventory, and capital turnover. High capital expenditure is a notable strength. Overall, the company's financial health is considered average, with potential risks in maintaining short-term obligations and generating profits. Future performance will depend on addressing these challenges and leveraging its capital expenditure.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
-3.93
Industry Median
15.73
Small Cap Median
15.73
P/E RATIO
-0.77
P/B RATIO
1.48
Industry Median
1.01
Small Cap Median
1.01
P/S RATIO
0.06
Industry Median
0.77
Small Cap Median
0.77
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
-0.56
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹18.63 as on Jun 15, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth is poor across all metrics. There is a decline or stagnation in revenue, operating profit, EPS, assets and net income. The company faces significant challenges in expanding its operations and increasing its profitability. It indicates potential issues with market competitiveness or internal strategies. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, highlighting the ongoing nature of these growth challenges.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 132.76 | 17.16 | -46.93 | -23.58 | 0.31 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 650 | -13.33 | -92.31 | -300 | 250 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -212.38 | -29.66 | -54.82 | -336 | 1273.45 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 38.03 | 10.2 | -59.88 | 44.62 | -8.51 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -250 | -33.33 | -50 | -300 | 1250 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios present a mixed picture. While capital expenditures are well-managed, adjusted EPS, cash EPS, book value per share, and dividend per share are low. The company has potential in managing its capital spending but needs to improve its earnings and shareholder returns. The weighted average calculation considers recent performance, highlighting the ongoing nature of these financial challenges.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 9.09 | 3.64 | 0.91 | -1.82 | -4.55 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 5.45 | 3.64 | 2.73 | -1.82 | -23.64 |
| Book Value Per Share | 37.27 | 39.09 | 40 | 38.18 | 12.73 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability is poor across all metrics. There are low margins and returns on capital, equity, and assets. The company needs to improve its cost management, pricing strategies, and asset utilization. This will increase its ability to generate profits. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, highlighting the ongoing nature of these profitability challenges.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 1.76 | 1.38 | -0.24 | -0.62 | -2.46 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 18 | 16 | 7 | -4 | -23 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 7.32 | 4.65 | 2.27 | -4.76 | -192.86 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 5.1 | 4.01 | 0.77 | -1.06 | -4.07 |
| Operating Margin | 2.2 | 1.63 | 0.24 | -0.62 | -2.15 |
| Net Margin | 0.44 | 0.25 | 0.24 | -0.62 | -8.31 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company shows mixed efficiency. Managing inventory and receivables is good. However, the turnover of fixed assets and capital is very low. This implies that the company is not generating enough revenue from its fixed assets and overall capital investments. Improving these turnover ratios should be a priority to boost overall efficiency. The weighted average calculation considers recent performance, highlighting the ongoing nature of these efficiency challenges.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 25.26 | 34.74 | 20.19 | 17.05 | 40.62 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 7.94 | 7.26 | 6.3 | 4.76 | 3.67 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 8.37 | 9.74 | 8.74 | 29.45 | 15.85 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 45.97 | 50.28 | 57.94 | 76.68 | 99.46 |
| Receivable Days | 43.61 | 37.47 | 41.76 | 12.39 | 23.03 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 16.61 | 18.56 | 9.61 | 7.7 | 22.7 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are poor, suggesting a limited ability to cover its interest expenses and equity dividends. This situation increases its financial risk, potentially making it difficult to meet its financial obligations. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, highlighting the ongoing nature of these coverage challenges.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 2 | 2.33 | 1.5 | N/A | N/A |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency is strong, indicating a good ability to meet long-term obligations. A lower debt level can provide financial flexibility, making the company less vulnerable to economic downturns. However, a very low debt level can also mean that the company is not taking advantage of opportunities to leverage debt for growth. This means they are not using debt to amplify returns or fund expansion.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| Equity Ratio | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.98 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. This could stem from poor management of current assets and liabilities. While the company may have sufficient assets, their ability to convert them quickly into cash is questionable. This situation could pose risks in handling unforeseen expenses or sudden downturns in revenue. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, suggesting that these liquidity issues are persistent.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2011 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.47 | 0.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.1 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.01 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.05 | -0.03 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanthala FMCG Products Ltd | 6.62 | 23.83 | Neutral | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.97 |
| 2 | Shyam Telecom Ltd | 3.63 | -0.77 | Neutral | -7.00 | -4.46 | -27.00 |
The management effectiveness of Shyam Telecom Ltd is weak. The company's financial performance is inconsistent, with declining sales and negative profit margins. Capital efficiency is poor, indicated by negative ROCE and ROE. The company's debt management raises concerns. While promoter holding remains consistent, the absence of institutional investment and the negative cash conversion cycle point to weak management effectiveness.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 66.15% | Stable promoter confidence |
| CONS | Sales Growth | -26% (3Y) | Declining revenue trend |
| Profit Growth | -172% (TTM) | Weak recent profitability | |
| ROCE | -23% (Mar 2015) | Poor capital utilization |
Financial Performance & Growth
Shyam Telecom Ltd demonstrates poor financial performance based on sales and profit growth metrics. Compounded Sales Growth shows a concerning trend: declining from 2% over 5 years to -26% over 3 years. The TTM sales growth is 0%, indicating stagnation. Compounded Profit Growth presents an alarming picture, with a TTM of -172%. Quarterly results show fluctuating sales and negative profit margins. The company's operating profit margin has decreased to -2% as of March 2015.
| Metric | 5 Years | 3 Years | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compounded Sales Growth (%) | 2% | -26% | 0% |
| Compounded Profit Growth (%) | N/A | N/A | -172% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Shyam Telecom exhibits poor capital efficiency and returns. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is negative, standing at -23% as of March 2015, indicating the company is not effectively utilizing its capital to generate profits. Return on Equity (ROE) is also negative at -20% in the last year, suggesting shareholder funds are not yielding positive returns. These negative returns reflect challenges in generating profits from the company's capital base.
| Metric | Mar 2008 | Mar 2011 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 10% | 18% | -4% | -23% |
| ROE (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A | -20% |
Financial Health & Prudence
Shyam Telecom's financial health is weak due to debt management. Although borrowings have decreased to zero as of March 2015, historical data shows significant debt levels. The company's ability to cover interest obligations is questionable given its negative or low operating profits. There is no dividend payout, indicating the company is not sharing profits.
| Metric | Mar 2006 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 390 | 35 | 35 | 0 |
| Dividend Payout % | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Working Capital Management
Shyam Telecom shows inconsistent working capital management. The cash conversion cycle fluctuates significantly, from -954 days in March 2006 to -4 days in March 2015. Debtor days have decreased from 80 in 2006 to 36 in 2015, while inventory days have increased from 50 to 96 over the same period. Payable days also vary widely.
| Metric | Mar 2006 | Mar 2009 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 80 | 208 | 38 | 36 |
| Inventory Days | 50 | 71 | 48 | 96 |
| Days Payable | 1,084 | 177 | 87 | 135 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | -954 | 102 | -0 | -4 |
The risk assessment for Shyam Telecom Ltd is red, indicating high risk. The company's negative profit margins, declining sales growth, and negative ROCE highlight financial instability. While promoter holding is stable, the lack of institutional investment reflects low confidence from sophisticated investors. The fluctuating cash conversion cycle and high historical debt levels contribute to the high-risk assessment.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Accounting quality red flags
There is no specific data available on accounting quality red flags.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe