Sical Logistics Ltd

Growth Ratio Summary

Growth Score : 6.00

The company's growth ratios reveal a mix of challenges and opportunities. Recent positive trends in Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth and Net Income Growth Rate suggest potential for future expansion. However, declines in Revenue Growth Rate and Asset Growth Rate indicate areas of concern. The weighted average calculation considers recent performance, so any improvements in these areas will be reflected. Balancing growth in profitability with sustainable revenue and asset growth will be key to the company's long-term success.

Financial Ratio Summary

Financial Score : 2.00

The financial ratios indicate several areas of concern. Negative values for Adjusted Earnings Per Share, Cash Earnings Per Share, and Book Value Per Share suggest underlying financial difficulties. Additionally, a low Capital Expenditures value may indicate limited investment in future growth. These factors can impact investor confidence and the company's long-term sustainability. The weighted average calculation considers recent data, but the overall trend suggests caution.

Profitability Ratio Summary

Profitability Score : 3.20

The company's profitability ratios suggest significant challenges. Negative Gross Profit Margin, Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), Return on Equity (ROE), and Net Margin indicate the company is struggling to generate profits. However, Operating Margin is good, suggesting some operational efficiency. These ratios are critical for assessing financial health and sustainability. The weighted average calculation highlights recent trends, but the overall picture suggests the company needs to address its underlying profitability issues.

Efficiency Ratio Summary

Efficiency Score : 5.00

The efficiency ratios showcase a mixed performance. Inventory management is a notable strength, as indicated by the high Inventory Turnover and low Days Sales in Inventory. However, Fixed Asset Turnover, Receivables Turnover, Receivable Days, and Capital Turnover suggest potential areas for improvement in asset utilization and collection processes. It's important to benchmark these ratios against industry peers to gain a deeper understanding of the company's operational efficiency. Recent trends are captured in the weighted average calculation, but focusing on improving asset turnover and receivable collection will be crucial for sustained efficiency.

Coverage Ratio Summary

Coverage Score : 2.00

The coverage ratios raise concerns about the company's ability to meet its financial obligations. A negative Interest Coverage Ratio indicates difficulties in covering interest expenses, while a low Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio suggests limited ability to provide dividends to shareholders. These ratios are crucial for assessing financial stability and risk. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, but the overall picture suggests potential financial strain.

Solvency Ratio Summary

Solvency Score : 7.00

The company's solvency ratios present a complex picture. The Debt to Equity and Debt to Asset ratios are excellent, indicating a strong reliance on debt, which can be beneficial if the company is generating sufficient returns on its investments. However, the Debt and Equity ratios raise concern, suggesting potential financial strain. It's important to consider these ratios in the context of the company's industry and overall financial strategy. The weighted average calculation captures recent trends, but the long-term implications of the debt levels need careful monitoring.

Liquidity Ratio Summary

Liquidity Score : 2.82

The company's liquidity position suggests challenges in meeting its short-term obligations. While the cash ratio and operating cash flow ratio indicate some ability to cover immediate liabilities, the current and quick ratios suggest potential difficulties in converting assets into cash to pay off current liabilities. This could be due to a high proportion of illiquid assets or issues with working capital management. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, so improvements in the latest periods are reflected, but the overall picture remains concerning.