Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd
Software & Services | Small Cap
Health Score : 3.04Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd, operating in the IT sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company maintains strong solvency due to minimal debt, which is a notable strength. However, its liquidity is weak, indicating potential challenges in meeting short-term obligations. Efficiency is varied, with excellent fixed asset turnover but poor inventory and capital turnover. Growth metrics are negative, reflecting declining revenue, profit, and earnings. Coverage ratios are also weak, suggesting difficulties in covering interest expenses. While capital expenditure is well-managed, profitability is poor due to negative margins and returns. Overall, the company's financial health is a concern, needing improvements in liquidity, growth, and profitability to ensure long-term stability.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio5.00
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio3.78
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Health Score : 3.04Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd, operating in the IT sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company maintains strong solvency due to minimal debt, which is a notable strength. However, its liquidity is weak, indicating potential challenges in meeting short-term obligations. Efficiency is varied, with excellent fixed asset turnover but poor inventory and capital turnover. Growth metrics are negative, reflecting declining revenue, profit, and earnings. Coverage ratios are also weak, suggesting difficulties in covering interest expenses. While capital expenditure is well-managed, profitability is poor due to negative margins and returns. Overall, the company's financial health is a concern, needing improvements in liquidity, growth, and profitability to ensure long-term stability.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
-26.10
Industry Median
16.66
Small Cap Median
16.08
P/E RATIO
-24.91
P/B RATIO
2.63
Industry Median
1.91
Small Cap Median
1.90
P/S RATIO
51.91
Industry Median
2.36
Small Cap Median
2.26
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
-31.24
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹136.78 as on Jun 15, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
Growth Score : 2.00The company's growth ratios are negative across the board, indicating a period of decline. Revenue, operating profit, EPS, asset, and net income growth rates are all below the threshold, reflecting significant challenges in maintaining and expanding its business. This negative performance raises concerns about the company's long-term sustainability.
Revenue Growth RatePoorOperating Profit Growth RatePoorEarnings Per Share (EPS) GrowthPoorAsset Growth RatePoorNet Income Growth RatePoor| Growth Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -42.7 | 83.11 | -56.11 | -39.72 | -4.1 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -512.71 | 10.61 | -27.41 | -37.17 | -3.53 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -397.32 | 24.6 | -13.95 | -42.21 | -6.38 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 59.42 | -27.46 | -7.14 | -3.36 | 18.24 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -414.46 | 25.02 | -13.4 | -41.83 | -6.06 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
Financial Score : 3.60The company's financial ratios present a mixed outlook. While capital expenditures are effectively managed, adjusted EPS, cash EPS, and book value per share are low, indicating challenges in generating shareholder value. The dividend per share is also low, reflecting limited returns to investors. This mixed performance suggests the need for improvements in overall financial management to enhance shareholder value.
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)PoorCash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)PoorBook Value Per SharePoorDividend Per Share (DPS)PoorCapital Expenditures (CapEx)Excellent| Financial Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -9.28 | -12.07 | -9.5 | -5.77 | -4.94 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | -8.79 | -9.89 | -8.08 | -4.48 | -4.43 |
| Book Value Per Share | 67.01 | 46.3 | 42.51 | 43.57 | 50.55 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
Profitability Score : 2.00The company's profitability ratios are generally poor. Gross profit, operating, and net margins are negative, indicating significant challenges in converting revenue into profit. Return on capital employed, equity, and assets are also low, reflecting inefficient use of resources. This poor profitability raises concerns about the company's long-term financial viability and sustainability.
Gross Profit MarginPoorReturn on Capital Employed (ROCE)PoorReturn on Equity (ROE)PoorReturn on Assets (ROA)PoorOperating MarginPoorNet MarginPoor| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -182.61 | -121.17 | -213.6 | -227.18 | -217.65 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -18.02 | -20.9 | -19.56 | -12.95 | -10.56 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -13.2 | -23.89 | -22.38 | -12.62 | -10.14 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | -13.13 | -20.03 | -15.65 | -10.18 | -8.3 |
| Operating Margin | -181.49 | -109.63 | -181.3 | -188.97 | -190.11 |
| Net Margin | -159.38 | -108.82 | -214.68 | -207.18 | -202.94 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Efficiency Score : 5.00The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. The fixed asset turnover ratio is excellent, indicating efficient use of fixed assets. However, the inventory and capital turnover ratios are poor, suggesting inefficient inventory and capital management. Receivable turnover is weak, indicating slow collection of receivables. This mixed performance highlights the need for improvements in overall asset and capital management.
Fixed Asset Turnover RatioExcellentInventory Turnover RatioPoorReceivables Turnover RatioWeakDays Sales in Inventory RatioExcellentReceivable DaysPoorCapital Turnover RatioPoor| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 42.37 | 2.75 | 2.56 | 3.33 | 1.83 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 3.43 | 5.18 | 2.58 | 3.71 | 3.56 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Receivable Days | 106.41 | 70.46 | 141.47 | 98.38 | 102.53 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
Coverage Score : 2.00The company's coverage ratios are weak. The interest coverage ratio is negative, indicating difficulties in covering interest expenses. The equity dividend coverage ratio is also low. This raises concerns about the company's ability to meet its financial obligations and sustain shareholder value.
Interest Coverage RatioPoorEquity Dividend Coverage RatioPoor| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | N/A | -64.76 | -63.43 | -79.7 | -153.8 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
Solvency Score : 10.00The company exhibits strong solvency. The debt, debt to equity, and debt to asset ratios are very low, indicating minimal reliance on debt. A high equity ratio further supports this, reflecting a strong equity base. This financial structure provides stability and reduces financial risk. The weighted average calculation underscores the company's consistent ability to maintain a solid equity position and manage its debt effectively.
Debt RatioExcellentDebt to Equity RatioExcellentEquity RatioExcellentDebt To Asset RatioExcellent| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Equity Ratio | 1 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
Liquidity Score : 3.78The company's liquidity position is concerning. While the quick ratio is average, both the current and operating cash flow ratios are poor, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. The cash ratio is weak, reflecting limited immediate liquidity. A higher current ratio would provide a greater safety margin for covering liabilities. The weighted average calculation emphasizes recent performance, highlighting the need for improvement in managing current assets and liabilities.
Current RatioPoorQuick RatioAverageCash RatioWeakOperating Cash Flow RatioPoor| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.19 | 1.49 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.19 | 1.49 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.84 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.16 | -1.54 | -0.96 | -0.64 | -0.57 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DRC Systems India Ltd | 7.57 | 10.64 | Neutral | 27.00 | 0.24 | 19.00 |
| 2 | Esconet Technologies Ltd | 7.52 | 21.42 | Neutral | 9.00 | 4.90 | 6.00 |
| 3 | On Door Concepts Ltd | 5.73 | 13.00 | Undervalued | 15.00 | 19.08 | 11.00 |
| 4 | SecureKloud Technologies Ltd | 3.13 | -0.50 | Neutral | 4.00 | -38.79 | -130.00 |
| 5 | Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd | 3.04 | -24.91 | Neutral | -7.11 | -5.01 | -7.59 |
Weak ManagementThe management effectiveness of Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd appears weak based on the available data. The company has demonstrated inconsistent financial performance with negative profit margins and declining sales growth. Capital efficiency is also a concern, as indicated by negative ROCE and ROE. While the promoter holding remains significant, the decreasing trend along with reduced institutional interest raises concerns. Overall, the financial health and operational performance suggest considerable challenges in management effectiveness.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Other Income | [0.89 Cr.] | Contributes marginally to offset losses. |
| CONS | Sales Growth | [-40%] | Declining revenue expansion. |
| Profitability | [Negative] | Weak and unsustainable. | |
| ROCE & ROE | [Negative] | Capital is not being used productively. |
Financial Performance & GrowthPoorCapital Efficiency & ReturnsPoorFinancial Health & PrudenceWeakShareholding & Ownership StructureAverageFinancial Performance & Growth
Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd. exhibits poor financial performance and growth. The company's financials reveal declining sales growth and negative profitability.
Weak Sales Growth: The compounded sales growth shows a concerning trend. The Sales Growth % has declined significantly, especially in recent times.
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth % | 73.24% | -42.70% | 83.11% | -56.11% | -39.72% |
Negative Profitability: The company's profitability metrics, such as OPM % and Net Profit, are consistently negative, indicating operational inefficiencies and a struggle to generate profits.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPM % | -181.49% | -109.63% | -181.30% | -188.97% |
| Net Profit (Cr.) | -12.83 | -16.04 | -13.89 | -8.08 |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns for Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd. are notably poor. This is evident from the negative Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) and Return on Equity (ROE), which signify inefficient utilization of capital and shareholder funds.
Negative ROCE: The ROCE % values are consistently negative, indicating that the company is not generating profits from its capital investments.
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE % | 6.17% | -18.02% | -20.90% | -19.56% | -12.33% |
Negative ROE: Similarly, the Return on Equity (ROE) is also negative, suggesting that shareholder funds are not being utilized effectively to generate returns.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE % | -18.02% | -20.90% | -19.56% | -12.33% |
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health and prudence of Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd. appear weak, characterized by its inability to maintain profitability and manage expenses effectively.
Inconsistent Expense Management: Employee costs as a percentage of sales is very high, indicating inefficient control over operational expenses. The company has reported losses in recent years, reflecting its ongoing financial struggles.
Reliance on Other Income: The company relies on other income to offset its losses, which is not a sustainable approach. This dependency indicates that the core operations are not generating sufficient revenue to cover expenses.
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Income | 1.24 | 1.67 | 0.50 | 0.89 |
| Net Profit | -12.83 | -16.04 | -13.89 | -8.08 |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding and ownership structure of Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd. indicates a mixed scenario. While promoter holding remains significant, there has been a notable decrease in recent periods. Institutional interest, particularly from FIIs, has also declined.
Decreasing Promoter Holding: The promoter holding has decreased over the last few years, indicating a gradual reduction in the promoters' stake in the company.
| Metric | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding % | 57.27% | 54.25% | 54.02% | 53.46% | 52.19% |
Reduced FII Interest: The stake held by Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) has significantly decreased, indicating a potential lack of confidence from foreign investors. DII holding is minimal
| Metric | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FII Holding % | 8.60% | 10.79% | 5.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Weak RiskBased on the available data, the risk assessment for Xelpmoc Design and Tech Ltd. is high. The company's negative profitability, declining sales growth, and inefficient capital utilization contribute to this elevated risk profile. The decreasing promoter holding and minimal institutional interest further compound the concerns. The company's financial instability and operational struggles suggest a significant risk for potential investors. Below is the summary of the risk assessment.
Accounting quality red flagsWeakSegment performance volatilityWeakForeign exchange or interest rate exposureAverageAccounting quality red flags
The Employee Cost % of sales is very high and fluctuates significantly, indicating potential issues with cost management and accounting practices. For example, in Mar 2016, the Employee Cost % was 6,750%, while in Mar 2025, it was 185%. These inconsistencies may indicate aggressive accounting practices or a lack of transparency in reporting expenses.
Segment performance volatility
The company exhibits significant volatility in its quarterly sales and profit figures. This variability suggests instability in segment performance, making it difficult to predict future financial outcomes.
| Metric | Mar 2022 | Jun 2022 | Sep 2022 | Dec 2022 | Mar 2023 | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOY Sales Growth % | -47.46% | -1.23% | 283.93% | 113.66% | 78.49% | -28.04% | -50.93% | -71.10% | -72.59% | -21.98% |
Foreign exchange or interest rate exposure
The interest expense is minimal, suggesting low exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The company's Other Income includes interest income, but this is not significant enough to create substantial exposure. Overall, the company's exposure to foreign exchange or interest rate risks appears to be moderate based on the available data.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe