Zodiac Energy Ltd
Utilities | Small Cap
Zodiac Energy Ltd, operating in the Construction & Engineering (Infrastructure) sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strong growth in revenue, operating profit, and earnings per share. Its solvency position is excellent, supported by a healthy equity ratio. The company maintains a good gross profit margin, return on assets and return on capital employed, indicating efficient use of capital. However, liquidity is a significant concern, with all liquidity ratios indicating poor performance. The company's financial ratios, such as adjusted EPS, book value per share and dividend per share, also need attention. Overall, Zodiac Energy exhibits high growth and solid profitability, but needs to address its liquidity and certain financial aspects to ensure long-term stability.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio8.00
- Financial Ratio4.00
- Profitability Ratio7.20
- Efficiency Ratio5.00
- Coverage Ratio5.60
- Solvency Ratio10.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Zodiac Energy Ltd, operating in the Construction & Engineering (Infrastructure) sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strong growth in revenue, operating profit, and earnings per share. Its solvency position is excellent, supported by a healthy equity ratio. The company maintains a good gross profit margin, return on assets and return on capital employed, indicating efficient use of capital. However, liquidity is a significant concern, with all liquidity ratios indicating poor performance. The company's financial ratios, such as adjusted EPS, book value per share and dividend per share, also need attention. Overall, Zodiac Energy exhibits high growth and solid profitability, but needs to address its liquidity and certain financial aspects to ensure long-term stability.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
N/A
Industry Median
16.74
Small Cap Median
17.70
P/E RATIO
26.21
P/B RATIO
5.19
Industry Median
2.41
Small Cap Median
2.28
P/S RATIO
1.28
Industry Median
1.86
Small Cap Median
1.67
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
13.09
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹346.72 as on Jun 15, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company exhibits significant growth across multiple metrics. Revenue growth, operating profit growth, and earnings per share growth are all very high, indicating strong market performance and effective management strategies. However, net income growth is poor. The company demonstrates potential, but needs to ensure that high growth translates into improved net income.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 33.33 | |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 51.35 | |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | 5.29 | |
| Asset Growth Rate | 42.18 | |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 5 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios indicate areas of concern. While capital expenditures are well-managed, adjusted EPS, book value per share, and dividend per share are low. Cash EPS is also not efficient. This mixed performance suggests potential challenges in creating shareholder value and managing key financial metrics effectively.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 13.22 | 13.95 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 15.33 | 20.67 |
| Book Value Per Share | 64 | 78 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0.79 | 0.7 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 97.7 | 43.4 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company exhibits strong profitability. Gross profit margin, return on assets, return on capital employed and operating margin are high, demonstrating efficient operations and effective cost management. However, return on equity and net margin are low. This mixed performance suggests that while the company is profitable at the operating level, there are challenges in translating this into net profits and returns for equity holders.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 8.33 | 8.46 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 17.96 | 15 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 20.83 | 17.95 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 10.91 | 11.62 |
| Operating Margin | 9.07 | 10.29 |
| Net Margin | 4.9 | 3.86 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While capital turnover is average, fixed asset, inventory, and receivables turnover are low, possibly indicating underutilization of assets and inefficient working capital management. The days sales in inventory and receivable days are strong, suggesting effective inventory and receivables management. Further investigation into the low turnover ratios is warranted to identify areas for operational improvement.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 4.43 | 4.15 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 7.33 | 5.56 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 7.16 | 6.4 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 49.8 | 65.65 |
| Receivable Days | 51 | 57.03 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 1.98 | 2.29 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios present a mixed view. While the interest coverage is solid, the equity dividend coverage is low. This suggests that while the company can comfortably cover its interest expenses, it may not be generating enough earnings to provide adequate dividend coverage. Balancing these factors is crucial to maintain financial health and investor confidence.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 4.11 | 2.53 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio | 16.67 | 20 |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company demonstrates a very strong solvency position, indicated by no debt. The equity ratio is optimal, suggesting the company relies on equity to finance its assets. All other solvency metrics align with this favorable position, implying a well-capitalized and financially stable operation. This provides a solid foundation for future growth and resilience against economic downturns.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.53 | 0.51 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 1.13 | 1.04 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.32 | 0.25 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is notably weak. The current, quick, and cash ratios are all at minimal levels, suggesting a struggle to meet short-term obligations. While some infrastructure projects may have unique cash flow patterns, the extremely low ratios indicate a potential risk in managing immediate liabilities. This could impact the company's ability to take on new projects or handle unexpected expenses. The operating cash flow ratio is also low, indicating that the company is not generating enough cash from its operations to cover its short-term liabilities.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.82 | 1.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.44 | 0.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.37 | 0.07 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay Cee Energy & Infra Ltd | 6.89 | 9.06 | Neutral | 32.00 | 15.38 | 19.00 |
| 2 | Indowind Energy Ltd | 5.91 | 134.63 | Overvalued | 14.93 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 3 | Zodiac Energy Ltd | 5.86 | 26.21 | Neutral | 56.00 | 13.93 | 21.00 |
The management of Zodiac Energy demonstrates mixed effectiveness. Strengths include robust sales and profit growth, alongside efficient capital utilization reflected in ROCE and ROE. However, these positives are offset by increasing debt levels and a slight decrease in promoter holding. Overall, management effectiveness is rated as mixed, requiring careful monitoring of financial prudence and operational stability.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Sales Growth (TTM) | 85% | Strong revenue expansion |
| Profit Growth (TTM) | 83% | Strong profit growth | |
| ROCE (Mar 2024) | 22% | Good capital productivity | |
| ROE (Last Year) | 28% | Good shareholder returns | |
| CONS | Debt/Equity (Mar 2025) | High | Increased financial leverage |
| Promoter Holding Decrease | 72.87% to 70.01% | Slight decrease in alignment |
Financial Performance & Growth
Zodiac Energy demonstrates strong financial performance and growth, particularly in sales and profit. The compounded sales growth has been robust over the past few years. The company has shown significant improvement in sales growth, reflecting strong market traction and effective strategies.
| Metric | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | 69% | 44% | -4% | 60% | 85% |
The compounded profit growth also shows a similar trend, with high growth rates in recent years. This indicates that the company is not only increasing its revenue but also effectively managing its profitability. The YOY sales growth has been particularly impressive, showcasing the company's ability to scale its operations effectively. The operating profit margin has improved, reflecting enhanced operational efficiency and cost management. Although there are fluctuations, the overall trend indicates a positive trajectory in financial performance.
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Zodiac Energy exhibits excellent capital efficiency and returns, as evidenced by its strong ROCE and ROE figures. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) indicates how well the company is utilizing its capital to generate profits. The Return on Equity (ROE) reflects the return generated on shareholders' equity. The company's ability to maintain high ROCE and ROE figures demonstrates efficient capital management and strong profitability.
| Metric | 2014–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 17.7% | 19.7% | 11% | 22% | 20% |
These ratios indicate that Zodiac Energy is effective in generating returns for its shareholders and efficiently deploying its capital. While there was a dip in 2023, the ROCE recovered in 2024, indicating the management's responsiveness and adaptive strategies.
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health and prudence of Zodiac Energy present a mixed picture. The company's debt management raises concerns due to increasing borrowings and a high debt-to-equity ratio. While the interest coverage ratio seems adequate, the increasing debt levels could pose challenges in the future.
| Metric | 2014–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 3.0 Cr | 15.7 Cr | 46 Cr | 41 Cr | 175 Cr |
| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest (Cr) | 3 | 4 | 9 |
Increased borrowings may lead to higher interest expenses, potentially impacting profitability. The dividend payout is inconsistent, ranging from 6% to 59% in few years and 0% in most years, indicating instability in profit sharing with shareholders.
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding and ownership structure of Zodiac Energy indicates moderate alignment between promoters and investors. The promoter holding is substantial but has decreased from 72.87% in March 2024 to 70.01% in March 2025. This decrease could signal a shift in promoter confidence or strategic decisions regarding equity dilution. Institutional holding by FIIs and DIIs is increasing, indicating growing interest from institutional investors.
| Metric | Jun 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding (%) | 72.86% | 72.86% | 72.87% | 70.01% |
| FIIs (%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| DIIs (%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% |
The increasing number of shareholders suggests growing public interest in the company. Overall, the shareholding pattern reflects a moderately positive sentiment, with strong promoter backing supplemented by increasing institutional interest.
Zodiac Energy's risk profile is assessed as moderate due to strengths in sales and profit growth, alongside efficient capital utilization reflected in ROCE and ROE. However, these positive aspects are counterbalanced by escalating debt levels, potential segment volatility, and fluctuations in operating performance. While promoter holding remains significant, a decrease indicates a mixed outlook.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
Off-balance sheet exposures are not explicitly quantified in the provided data. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of potential risks arising from such exposures cannot be made. Further investigation into the company's financial statements and disclosures would be required to evaluate this aspect thoroughly.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available regarding contingent liabilities. Without detailed information, it is not possible to evaluate the potential financial risks associated with these liabilities. Additional disclosures from the company would be necessary to assess this risk factor adequately.
Accounting quality red flags
No obvious accounting quality red flags are apparent in the provided data. However, this assessment is limited to the available metrics and does not encompass a comprehensive audit or forensic accounting review. Further scrutiny of financial reporting practices may be warranted for a more definitive conclusion.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe