Kay Cee Energy & Infra Ltd
Construction | Small Cap
Kay Cee Energy & Infra Ltd presents a mixed financial profile, characterized by exceptional profitability and financial stability, but offset by significant operational challenges. The company's key strength lies in its very low debt levels, which provides a strong cushion against financial shocks and reduces risk. It is also highly profitable, effectively turning revenue into profit. However, there are notable weaknesses in its day-to-day operations. The company faces difficulties in managing its short-term cash flow, as its operations currently consume more cash than they generate. Furthermore, it is slow to sell its inventory and collect payments from customers. While its growth in revenue and assets is strong, the future outlook depends on its ability to address these operational inefficiencies, as they could eventually hinder its impressive profitability and growth trajectory.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio8.00
- Financial Ratio6.60
- Profitability Ratio10.00
- Efficiency Ratio3.67
- Coverage Ratio5.60
- Solvency Ratio9.50
- Liquidity Ratio4.96
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Kay Cee Energy & Infra Ltd presents a mixed financial profile, characterized by exceptional profitability and financial stability, but offset by significant operational challenges. The company's key strength lies in its very low debt levels, which provides a strong cushion against financial shocks and reduces risk. It is also highly profitable, effectively turning revenue into profit. However, there are notable weaknesses in its day-to-day operations. The company faces difficulties in managing its short-term cash flow, as its operations currently consume more cash than they generate. Furthermore, it is slow to sell its inventory and collect payments from customers. While its growth in revenue and assets is strong, the future outlook depends on its ability to address these operational inefficiencies, as they could eventually hinder its impressive profitability and growth trajectory.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
7.62
Industry Median
9.06
Small Cap Median
8.20
P/E RATIO
9.06
P/B RATIO
1.85
Industry Median
1.30
Small Cap Median
1.30
P/S RATIO
1.12
Industry Median
1.06
Small Cap Median
0.91
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
6.19
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹141.05 as on May 30, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company is in a strong growth phase, showing excellent expansion in sales, operating profits, and its overall asset base. This points to strong market demand and successful business expansion. A notable downside, however, is that this impressive corporate growth is not currently translating into higher earnings per share for its stockholders, which is a key concern for investors.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | 7.19 | |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 18.52 | |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -1.35 | |
| Asset Growth Rate | 36.78 | |
| Net Income Growth Rate | 11.76 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
From a shareholder's viewpoint, the company's financial standing is solid. It generates good earnings for each share and appears to be investing wisely in its future without overspending. However, the value of the company's assets per share is only moderate, and it currently offers no dividend payments, indicating that returns to shareholders are primarily tied to future growth rather than current income.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | 15.46 | 15.83 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 15.45 | 15.83 |
| Book Value Per Share | 56.36 | 85.83 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 2.5 | 0.4 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability is its greatest strength, showing outstanding performance across all metrics. It is highly effective at managing costs and maximizing returns from its operations. This ability to generate strong profits from its sales and invested capital is a clear sign of a healthy, well-managed business and a powerful driver of its overall financial standing.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 17.65 | 19.51 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 35.44 | 22 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 27.42 | 18.45 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 15.52 | 13.45 |
| Operating Margin | 17.65 | 19.51 |
| Net Margin | 11.11 | 11.59 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's operational efficiency is a key area of weakness. It struggles significantly with managing its inventory and collecting payments from customers, which ties up valuable cash. Although it uses its fixed assets well, the overall inefficiency in its working capital cycle indicates a drag on its financial performance. This means that cash is locked in operations for extended periods, which can impact liquidity.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 7.65 | 8.2 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 3.71 | 3.24 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 3.8 | 4.49 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 98.38 | 112.65 |
| Receivable Days | 96 | 81.29 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 1.94 | 1.38 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's capacity to meet its financial obligations is satisfactory. It earns more than enough to comfortably cover its interest payments, which significantly lowers the risk of defaulting on its loans. On the other hand, the company is not currently sharing profits with its shareholders in the form of dividends, choosing instead to retain earnings within the business.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 5.6 | 4.12 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company demonstrates an exceptionally strong long-term financial position with very low risk. It relies heavily on owner's equity rather than debt to finance its assets, which indicates a very stable and conservative financial structure. This robust solvency provides a substantial safeguard against economic downturns and gives the company significant flexibility for future investments without being burdened by interest payments.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.22 | 0.13 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.28 | 0.15 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.78 | 0.87 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.1 | 0.07 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations shows some areas of concern. While it appears capable of covering immediate debts with its more liquid assets, a significant weakness is its inability to generate positive cash flow from its core business operations. This suggests a potential strain on managing day-to-day expenses and a reliance on converting receivables into cash rather than generating it directly, which could create pressure on its working capital.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.63 | 1.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.27 | 1.42 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | -0.79 | -0.29 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay Cee Energy & Infra Ltd | 6.89 | 9.06 | Neutral | 32.00 | 15.38 | 19.00 |
| 2 | Indowind Energy Ltd | 5.91 | 134.63 | Overvalued | 14.93 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 3 | Energy Development Company Ltd | 5.58 | -331.60 | Neutral | 27.52 | -1.48 | -0.24 |
| 4 | Surana Solar Ltd | 3.97 | -2675.00 | Neutral | 0.45 | 0.25 | -0.05 |
Management effectiveness is assessed as weak. While the company reports strong return metrics like ROE and ROCE, these are overshadowed by significant operational and financial weaknesses. Key concerns include a sharp deterioration in the cash conversion cycle, persistent negative cash from operations despite reported profits, and declining promoter shareholding. Recent quarterly performance shows a significant contraction in both sales and profit, indicating volatility and potential challenges in sustaining growth. The increasing reliance on debt combined with a decreasing interest coverage ratio further elevates the risk profile, painting a picture of a management team struggling with operational efficiency and financial prudence.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Return on Equity | 32.1% | excellent |
| Return on Capital Employed | 29.3% | very strong | |
| Improving Annual OPM | 18% to 19% | improving | |
| CONS | Negative Cash from Operations | -35 Cr (FY26) | poor |
| Deteriorating Cash Conversion Cycle | 66 to 196 days | weak | |
| Declining Promoter Holding | 70.4% to 63.4% | weak | |
| Recent Quarterly Sales Decline | -29.47% | volatile |
Financial Performance & Growth
The company's financial performance presents a mixed but concerning picture. While annual figures show growth, with TTM sales growth at 8% and profit growth at 10%, the underlying consistency is weak. Recent quarterly results indicate significant stress, with sales declining by 29.47% and net profit by 20.40% in the latest reported quarter. This volatility points to instability in revenue and earnings. On an annual basis, operating profit margins have shown slight improvement, moving from 18% to 19%, suggesting some control over operational costs. The primary concern remains the sharp and recent downturn in quarterly performance, which overshadows the modest annual growth figures.
| Metric (Quarterly) | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales (Cr) | 115 | 83 | 81 |
| Net Profit (Cr) | 12 | 9 | 10 |
| OPM (%) | 17% | 18% | 20% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Capital efficiency metrics are contradictory. The company posts an excellent Return on Equity (ROE) of 32.1% and a very strong Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) of 29.3%. These headline figures suggest productive use of capital. However, a deeper look into working capital management reveals severe weaknesses. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) has deteriorated dramatically, increasing from 66 days to 196 days between March 2025 and March 2026. This indicates that a significantly larger amount of capital is being tied up in operations, primarily due to a surge in inventory days from 148 to 236. Furthermore, asset turnover has declined from 0.88 to 0.69, showing that assets are becoming less effective at generating revenue. The strong ROE/ROCE figures are undermined by these poor operational efficiency indicators.
| Metric | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| ROCE % | - | 22% |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 66 | 196 |
| Asset Turnover | 0.88 | 0.69 |
Financial Health & Prudence
The company's financial health shows signs of increasing risk. Total borrowings have increased from ₹55 Cr in March 2025 to ₹75 Cr in March 2026, indicating a growing reliance on debt. While the debt-to-equity ratio improved from 0.89 to 0.73 due to an expanding equity base, the company's ability to service its debt is weakening. The interest coverage ratio declined from 5.6 times to 4.1 times over the same period. This reduction indicates that operating profits cover interest payments by a smaller margin. Additionally, the company has a consistent dividend payout of 0%, meaning no profits are distributed to shareholders. This combination of rising debt, falling interest coverage, and no dividend payout points to a weak financial prudence.
| Metric | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (Cr) | 55 | 75 |
| Debt / Equity Ratio | 0.89 | 0.73 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 5.6x | 4.1x |
| Dividend Payout % | 0% | 0% |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding structure indicates low confidence from both promoters and institutional investors. Promoter holding has seen a notable decline, dropping from 70.35% in March 2025 to 63.41% by March 2026. This reduction suggests a decrease in the promoters' long-term conviction in the company. Institutional holding remains negligible and erratic. Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) holding is virtually zero. Domestic Institutional Investor (DII) holding has been volatile and fell to 1.81% by March 2026. The lack of stable, significant ownership by institutional investors suggests the company is not currently attractive to this class of investor. The combination of declining promoter stake and low institutional interest is a significant weakness.
| Shareholding (%) | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 70.26% | 70.35% | 63.41% |
| FIIs | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| DIIs | 1.41% | 2.53% | 1.81% |
The overall risk assessment is high. The most critical risk is the poor accounting quality, evidenced by large and persistent negative cash flow from operations despite reported profits. This disconnect between profit and cash is a major red flag, questioning the quality and sustainability of earnings. This is compounded by significant financial risk, as the company's ability to cover its rising interest payments is deteriorating. Operational risks are also elevated, demonstrated by a sharp increase in the cash conversion cycle, which points to severe inefficiencies in working capital management. The declining promoter holding further adds a layer of governance and confidence risk. These combined factors create a high-risk profile for the company.
Accounting quality red flags
A significant accounting red flag is the stark divergence between reported profits and actual cash generation. The company reported positive profit from operations of ₹26 Cr and ₹32 Cr for FY25 and FY26, respectively. However, the cash from operating activity for the same periods was deeply negative, at -₹74 Cr and -₹35 Cr. The CFO to Operating Profit ratio stands at alarming levels of -285% and -109%. This indicates that the company's profits are not being converted into cash, with funds being aggressively consumed by working capital changes. Such a persistent and large negative operating cash flow is a primary indicator of poor earnings quality and unsustainable business operations.
Interest rate exposure
The company faces a growing risk from its debt obligations. Total borrowings are scheduled to increase from ₹55 Cr to ₹75 Cr, while the corresponding interest expense rises from ₹5 Cr to ₹8 Cr. This increase in financial leverage is occurring simultaneously with a decline in the company's ability to service this debt. The interest coverage ratio, which measures operating profit relative to interest payments, is projected to fall from 5.6 in FY25 to 4.1 in FY26. A declining coverage ratio indicates a shrinking buffer to absorb any unforeseen decline in earnings or rise in interest rates, thereby increasing the company's financial vulnerability.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe