Growth Ratio Summary

Growth Score : 4.00

Phoenix Mills demonstrates strong growth trends, particularly in revenue, operating profit, assets and net income. This suggests the company is expanding its operations and increasing its market presence effectively. However, the negative earnings per share (EPS) growth indicates an area of concern, which needs to be addressed to ensure sustainable growth. The weighted average calculation reflects the overall positive growth momentum, albeit with the noted EPS challenge.

Financial Ratio Summary

Financial Score : 4.00

The financial ratios present a positive outlook for Phoenix Mills. Strong adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and cash earnings per share (EPS) indicate good profitability and cash generation. The increasing book value per share reflects growing shareholder equity. However, the absence of dividends and high capital expenditures are notable factors. These ratios collectively suggest a company focused on growth and reinvestment. The weighted average calculation highlights the overall financial strengths but also points to areas needing attention.

Profitability Ratio Summary

Profitability Score : 3.00

Phoenix Mills exhibits strong gross and operating profit margins, indicating efficient core operations and effective cost management. However, lower returns on capital employed (ROCE) and equity (ROE) suggest that the company is not generating optimal returns from its investments and equity. This mixed performance indicates areas for improvement in capital allocation and profitability. The weighted average calculation underscores that the company needs to make better use of its capital to improve overall profitability.

Efficiency Ratio Summary

Efficiency Score : 3.00

The efficiency ratios present a mixed picture of Phoenix Mills' operational effectiveness. While the receivables turnover ratio is strong, indicating efficient collection of revenues, the inventory turnover ratio and days sales in inventory are concerning, suggesting potential issues in inventory management. This mixed performance indicates areas of strength and weakness in the company's operational efficiency. The weighted average calculation highlights the need for more balanced improvements across all efficiency metrics.

Coverage Ratio Summary

Coverage Score : 3.00

The coverage ratios are moderate, indicating an adequate but not exceptional ability to meet interest obligations. While the interest coverage ratio is above the minimum threshold, there's room for improvement to provide a greater buffer against financial risks. Enhancing coverage ratios would increase financial stability and investor confidence. The weighted average calculation suggests a need for consistent focus on improving these ratios.

Solvency Ratio Summary

Solvency Score : 4.00

The company's solvency indicates a stable financial structure. A manageable debt ratio suggests that the company is not excessively leveraged. The debt to equity ratio indicates a healthy balance between debt and equity financing. A good interest coverage ratio demonstrates the ability to comfortably meet its interest obligations. This provides a cushion against potential financial difficulties. The weighted average calculation reflects a consistent trend of manageable debt levels and adequate coverage capabilities.

Liquidity Ratio Summary

Liquidity Score : 1.00

The company's liquidity position is a significant area of concern. The current, quick, and cash ratios are all quite low, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. While a higher operating cash flow ratio is a positive sign, the overall liquidity profile suggests that the company may struggle to convert its current assets into cash quickly. This could impact its ability to fund operations and investments smoothly. The calculation method prioritizes recent data, making the current low liquidity levels particularly alarming.