Sakthi Sugars Ltd
Food Beverages & Tobacco | Small Cap
Health Score : 3.51Sakthi Sugars Ltd, operating in the FMCG sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company exhibits strong solvency and efficiency in specific areas like managing inventory and receivable days. However, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability, indicating potential financial risks. While capital expenditure management is a strength, the company needs to focus on improving its earnings per share, profitability margins, and overall revenue growth. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent years, highlights the consistent challenges across multiple financial metrics. Overall, Sakthi Sugars demonstrates a need for strategic improvements to ensure long-term financial stability and growth.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentBalanced
- Risk AssessmentBalanced
- 1 HourBearish
- 2 HoursBearish
- 4 HoursBearish
- 1 DayBearish
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Health Score : 3.51Sakthi Sugars Ltd, operating in the FMCG sector, shows a mixed financial performance. The company exhibits strong solvency and efficiency in specific areas like managing inventory and receivable days. However, it struggles with liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability, indicating potential financial risks. While capital expenditure management is a strength, the company needs to focus on improving its earnings per share, profitability margins, and overall revenue growth. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent years, highlights the consistent challenges across multiple financial metrics. Overall, Sakthi Sugars demonstrates a need for strategic improvements to ensure long-term financial stability and growth.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
7.40
Industry Median
7.38
Small Cap Median
7.38
P/E RATIO
-1.18
P/B RATIO
0.81
Industry Median
0.64
Small Cap Median
0.64
P/S RATIO
0.39
Industry Median
0.47
Small Cap Median
0.47
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
-20.26
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹17.53 as on Jun 20, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
Growth Score : 2.00The company's growth ratios are generally low, indicating limited expansion and potential stagnation. The fact that all the growth ratios are scoring the lowest possible, suggests consistent challenges in growing the business. This situation could limit the company's competitiveness and long-term prospects.
Revenue Growth RatePoorOperating Profit Growth RatePoorEarnings Per Share (EPS) GrowthPoorAsset Growth RatePoorNet Income Growth RatePoor| Growth Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -13.5 | -57.88 | -1.91 | 12.79 | -42.87 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -22.22 | -29.81 | -61.95 | 165.12 | -132.46 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -221.51 | -114.15 | 15.69 | -167 | -550.15 |
| Asset Growth Rate | 10.91 | -47.58 | -5.17 | -10.7 | 1.25 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -424.18 | -113.9 | 14.63 | -182.98 | -553.85 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
Financial Score : 3.60The company's financial ratios are mixed. While capital expenditure management is strong, there are significant weaknesses in earnings per share, book value, and dividend per share. This mixed performance suggests opportunities for improvements in certain financial areas to enhance overall financial health.
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)PoorCash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)PoorBook Value Per SharePoorDividend Per Share (DPS)PoorCapital Expenditures (CapEx)Excellent| Financial Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -15.83 | -5.83 | -5 | -4.2 | -13.28 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 44.06 | 2.4 | 2.81 | 8.07 | -10.42 |
| Book Value Per Share | 118.54 | 40.21 | 38.23 | 23.11 | 21.76 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 41 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
Profitability Score : 2.00The company's profitability ratios are weak, indicating difficulties in generating profits from its sales and assets. The fact that all the profitability ratios are scoring the lowest possible, suggests consistent challenges in maintaining profit margins. This situation could limit the company's ability to reinvest in its business and generate returns for investors.
Gross Profit MarginPoorReturn on Capital Employed (ROCE)PoorReturn on Equity (ROE)PoorReturn on Assets (ROA)PoorOperating MarginPoorNet MarginPoor| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 1.66 | 5.85 | -3.78 | 6.16 | -17.01 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -7 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 25.92 | -10.62 | -12.81 | 14.18 | -68.34 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 3.89 | 5.21 | 2.09 | 6.21 | -1.99 |
| Operating Margin | 8.1 | 13.5 | 5.24 | 12.31 | -6.99 |
| Net Margin | 14.85 | -4.9 | -5.72 | 4.21 | -33.46 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Efficiency Score : 4.67The company's efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. There are some inefficiencies in asset utilization, but strong performance in managing inventory and receivables. This mixed performance suggests opportunities for improvements in certain operational areas to enhance overall efficiency.
Fixed Asset Turnover RatioPoorInventory Turnover RatioPoorReceivables Turnover RatioPoorDays Sales in Inventory RatioExcellentReceivable DaysExcellentCapital Turnover RatioPoor| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.43 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 5.1 | 3.13 | 8.35 | 8.16 | 5.71 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 7.88 | 4.55 | 6.87 | 14.25 | 33.06 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 71.57 | 116.61 | 43.71 | 44.73 | 63.92 |
| Receivable Days | 46.32 | 80.22 | 53.13 | 25.61 | 11.04 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.6 | 0.85 | 0.5 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
Coverage Score : 2.00The company's coverage ratios are weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting its debt and dividend obligations. The fact that all coverage ratios are scoring the lowest possible, suggests a concerning lack of financial buffer. This situation could increase the company's vulnerability to financial distress.
Interest Coverage RatioPoorEquity Dividend Coverage RatioPoor| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 1.84 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 1.31 | -0.68 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
Solvency Score : 8.00The company shows a strong position in terms of solvency, suggesting a solid financial structure with the ability to meet its long-term obligations. While debt and debt to asset ratios are good, the equity ratio is poor. This reflects a sustainable debt level relative to its assets but very less equity.
Debt RatioExcellentDebt to Equity RatioExcellentEquity RatioPoorDebt To Asset RatioExcellent| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 1.44 | 2.57 | 2.7 | 3 | 3.17 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
Liquidity Score : 2.00The company's liquidity position is weak, indicating difficulties in meeting its short-term obligations. The fact that all liquidity ratios are scoring the lowest possible, suggests a concerning lack of liquid assets. This situation could limit the company's operational flexibility and increase its vulnerability to financial stress. Improving liquidity is crucial for maintaining smooth operations and investor confidence.
Current RatioPoorQuick RatioPoorCash RatioPoorOperating Cash Flow RatioPoor| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 0.46 | 0.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.44 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.47 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.05 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mawana Sugars Ltd | 7.25 | 4.09 | Highly Undervalued | 105.00 | 9.39 | 37.00 |
| 2 | KCP Sugar & Industries Corporation Ltd | 6.61 | 22.42 | Overvalued | 1.00 | -0.23 | 11.00 |
| 3 | KM Sugar Mills Ltd | 5.97 | 4.67 | Undervalued | 87.00 | 5.81 | 53.00 |
| 4 | Rana Sugars Ltd | 5.92 | 8.27 | Neutral | 41.00 | 1.55 | 24.00 |
| 5 | Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd | 5.27 | 5.64 | Neutral | 36.00 | 55.86 | 48.00 |
| 6 | Vishwaraj Sugar Industries Ltd | 5.09 | -4.36 | Neutral | -10.00 | -1.29 | -28.00 |
| 7 | Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd | 4.78 | 3.59 | Highly Undervalued | 34.00 | 0.34 | 27.00 |
| 8 | Sakthi Sugars Ltd | 3.51 | -1.18 | Neutral | -37.00 | 2.37 | -177.00 |
| 9 | Kothari Sugars & Chemicals Ltd | 3.51 | 92.89 | Highly Overvalued | 28.00 | 0.80 | 2.00 |
Balanced ManagementThe management effectiveness of Sakthi Sugars Ltd presents a mixed picture. While the promoter holding remains consistently high, the financial performance shows concerning trends. The company has experienced negative compounded sales and profit growth over the past several years, coupled with a decline in operating profit margin. The company's profitability has been volatile, and reliance on other income has been inconsistent. The strategic and operational indicators reveal challenges in working capital management.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 59.83% | Indicates confidence and alignment with shareholders |
| CONS | Sales Growth | -14% (3Y Compounded) | Declining sales growth indicates market challenges |
| Profit Growth | -24% (5Y Compounded) | Declining profit growth suggests operational inefficiencies | |
| OPM | -7% (Mar 2018) | Operational efficiency is deteriorating |
Financial Performance & GrowthPoorCapital Efficiency & ReturnsWeakFinancial Health & PrudenceAverageStrategic & Operational IndicatorsAverageFinancial Performance & Growth
Sakthi Sugars Ltd demonstrates a concerning trend in financial performance and growth. The compounded sales growth has been negative over the past 10 years. Compounded profit growth is also negative. The operating profit margin (OPM) has shown significant volatility, with a concerning value of -7% in Mar 2018. This indicates a struggle to maintain operational efficiency. Overall, the financial performance and growth metrics suggest significant challenges for Sakthi Sugars Ltd.
| Metric | CAGR (2016-2018) | CAGR (2019-2021) | CAGR (2022-2024) | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounded Sales Growth (%) | -25% | -25% | -14% | -43% |
| Compounded Profit Growth (%) | -24% | -24% | -24% | -216% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns for Sakthi Sugars Ltd are weak. While the current ROCE is 31.79, this figure needs to be viewed in the context of inconsistent profitability and fluctuating sales. The ROE is exceedingly high at 227.46, which may not be sustainable or indicative of genuine shareholder value creation, especially given the company's inconsistent profitability. The cash conversion cycle data shows volatility, suggesting challenges in managing working capital efficiently.
| Metric | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 5% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 0% | 6% | -7% |
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health and prudence of Sakthi Sugars Ltd present a mixed view. While debt levels have decreased from ₹1,041 Cr in Jun 2006 to ₹919 Cr in Mar 2018, the company still carries a significant debt burden. The dividend payout percentage has been consistently zero since Mar 2011, indicating that the company is not currently sharing profits with shareholders. Overall, financial health requires careful management due to high debt and inconsistent profitability.
| Metric | Jun 2006 | Dec 2009 | Mar 2012 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (Cr) | 1,041 | 2,194 | 2,236 | 1,197 | 919 |
Strategic & Operational Indicators
The strategic and operational indicators for Sakthi Sugars Ltd reveal both strengths and weaknesses. The company's working capital management, as indicated by Debtor Days, Inventory Days, and Days Payable, shows variability. Debtor Days have significantly decreased from 48 days in Mar 2016 to 7 days in Mar 2018, suggesting improved efficiency in collecting receivables. Inventory Days have fluctuated. Payables have increased from 196 days to 220 days. The cash conversion cycle has been negative, indicating that the company collects cash from customers before paying its suppliers.
| Metric | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 44 | 57 | 48 | 9 | 7 |
| Inventory Days | 145 | 73 | 71 | 64 | 95 |
| Days Payable | 188 | 180 | 196 | 147 | 220 |
Balanced RiskThe risk assessment for Sakthi Sugars Ltd is rated Orange. The company faces significant challenges related to inconsistent profitability and negative profit growth trends raise concerns about the sustainability of its financial performance. The company's high debt levels also contribute to the risk profile.
Accounting quality red flagsAverageAccounting quality red flags
The inconsistent profitability and negative profit growth trends warrant careful scrutiny of accounting practices. Stability and consistency in financial reporting are essential for maintaining investor confidence.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 26 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 1017.82Bearish
- SMA 2017.99Bearish
- SMA 5017.92Bearish
- EMA 1017.76Bearish
- EMA 2017.89Bearish
- EMA 5017.90Bearish
- DEMA 1017.56Bullish
- DEMA 2017.76Bearish
- DEMA 5017.97Bearish
- TEMA 1017.48Bullish
- TEMA 2017.59Bearish
- TEMA 5017.97Bearish
- MACD-0.12Bearish
- ADX45.17Strong Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI37.36Neutral
- CCI-134.81Oversold
- ROC 9-2.93Bearish
- ROC 14-3.36Bearish
- ROC 25-3.14Bearish
- Stoch K55.38Neutral
- Stoch D53.16Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper18.54Neutral
- BB Middle17.99Neutral
- BB Lower17.44Neutral
- ATR0.27High Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI27.76Neutral
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 26 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Strong Bearish
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bullish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 1017.98Bearish
- SMA 2018.09Bearish
- SMA 5017.75Bearish
- EMA 1017.88Bearish
- EMA 2017.93Bearish
- EMA 5017.87Bearish
- DEMA 1017.73Bearish
- DEMA 2017.95Bearish
- DEMA 5017.91Bearish
- TEMA 1017.58Bearish
- TEMA 2017.85Bearish
- TEMA 5018.00Bearish
- MACD-0.01Bearish
- ADX43.54Strong Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI40.45Neutral
- CCI-216.19Oversold
- ROC 9-3.41Bearish
- ROC 14-2.93Bearish
- ROC 250.86Bullish
- Stoch K51.77Neutral
- Stoch D43.70Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper18.58Neutral
- BB Middle18.09Neutral
- BB Lower17.60Oversold
- ATR0.36Low Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI30.30Neutral
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 26 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Strong Bearish
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bullish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 1018.05Bearish
- SMA 2017.79Bearish
- SMA 5017.76Bearish
- EMA 1017.88Bearish
- EMA 2017.85Bearish
- EMA 5017.80Bearish
- DEMA 1017.87Bearish
- DEMA 2017.90Bearish
- DEMA 5017.96Bearish
- TEMA 1017.77Bearish
- TEMA 2017.97Bearish
- TEMA 50N/AN/A
- MACD0.04Bearish
- ADX21.69Weak Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI44.75Neutral
- CCI-59.33Neutral
- ROC 9-3.25Bearish
- ROC 142.15Bullish
- ROC 250.98Bullish
- Stoch K46.72Neutral
- Stoch D51.59Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper18.49Neutral
- BB Middle17.79Neutral
- BB Lower17.08Neutral
- ATR0.52Low Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI57.41Neutral
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 33 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bearish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 1017.77Bearish
- SMA 2017.77Bearish
- SMA 5018.04Bearish
- SMA 10017.07Bullish
- SMA 20018.64Bearish
- EMA 1017.84Bearish
- EMA 2017.82Bearish
- EMA 5017.68Bearish
- EMA 10017.77Bearish
- EMA 20019.08Bearish
- DEMA 1017.89Bearish
- DEMA 2017.84Bearish
- DEMA 5017.91Bearish
- DEMA 10017.01Bullish
- DEMA 20015.93Bullish
- TEMA 1017.94Bearish
- TEMA 2017.77Bearish
- TEMA 5018.19Bearish
- TEMA 10017.89Bearish
- TEMA 20016.22Bullish
- MACD0.02Bullish
- ADX13.85Weak Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI46.20Neutral
- CCI-69.02Neutral
- ROC 14-1.90Bearish
- ROC 25-2.67Bearish
- Stoch K57.05Neutral
- Stoch D63.02Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper18.40Neutral
- BB Middle17.77Neutral
- BB Lower17.13Neutral
- ATR0.80High Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI40.13Neutral
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 21 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bullish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 2016.93Bullish
- SMA 5019.42Bearish
- EMA 2017.62Bullish
- EMA 5019.59Bearish
- DEMA 2016.97Bullish
- DEMA 5015.89Bullish
- TEMA 2017.75Bearish
- TEMA 5015.52Bullish
- MACD-0.37Bullish
- ADX23.46Weak Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI45.52Neutral
- CCI-55.34Neutral
- ROC 148.42Bullish
- ROC 25-7.30Bearish
- Stoch K58.93Neutral
- Stoch D58.58Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper19.83Neutral
- BB Middle16.93Neutral
- BB Lower14.03Neutral
- ATR1.75Low Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI55.23Neutral
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 25 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe
Trend Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Momentum Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Volatility Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Bullish
Volume Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- SMA 617.34Bullish
- SMA 1219.65Bearish
- SMA 2425.52Bearish
- EMA 617.92Bearish
- EMA 1219.74Bearish
- EMA 2422.45Bearish
- DEMA 616.78Bullish
- DEMA 1216.23Bullish
- DEMA 2419.54Bearish
- TEMA 617.41Bullish
- TEMA 1215.74Bullish
- TEMA 2415.72Bullish
- MACD-1.05Bearish
- ADX23.81Weak Trend
- IndicatorValueSignal
- RSI45.31Neutral
- CCI-83.99Neutral
- ROC 25-54.24Bearish
- ROC 5029.96Bullish
- Stoch K10.61Oversold
- Stoch D25.98Neutral
- IndicatorValueSignal
- BB Upper33.79Neutral
- BB Middle22.69Neutral
- BB Lower11.59Neutral
- ATR5.05Low Volatility
- IndicatorValueSignal
- MFI55.22Neutral