Salasar Techno Engineering Ltd

Growth Ratio Summary

Growth Score : 6.00

The growth highlights mixed performance. Revenue and operating profit have shown good growth. However, the company has experienced a decline in earnings per share and net income growth. While revenue and operating income are expanding, profitability is a concern. The company's revenue growth indicates successful market penetration and sales strategies. This mixed performance suggests that while the company is expanding its operations, it needs to focus on improving its bottom-line profitability.

Financial Ratio Summary

Financial Score : 2.40

The financial ratios present a concerning picture of the company's financial performance. The adjusted earnings per share is poor, indicating low profitability. The cash earnings per share is also weak, suggesting limited cash generation relative to shares outstanding. The book value per share is low, reflecting a modest net asset value. The dividend per share is minimal, providing little return to shareholders. Capital expenditures are relatively high, potentially straining the company's finances. These factors collectively raise concerns about the company's financial sustainability.

Profitability Ratio Summary

Profitability Score : 9.80

The profitability position is strong. The gross profit margin is good, indicating efficient production and cost management. The return on capital employed and return on equity are also strong, demonstrating effective use of capital and equity to generate profits. The return on assets is good, reflecting efficient asset utilization. The operating and net margins are also strong, showcasing effective cost control and profitability. These factors collectively highlight the company's ability to generate profits from its operations and investments.

Efficiency Ratio Summary

Efficiency Score : 3.00

The efficiency ratios indicate challenges in optimizing asset utilization. The fixed asset turnover ratio is low, suggesting less efficient use of fixed assets to generate revenue. The inventory turnover ratio is also low, indicating slow-moving inventory and potential overstocking. The receivables turnover ratio is low as well, indicating a longer time to collect payments. The days sales in inventory and receivable days are high, further confirming inefficiencies in inventory and receivables management. These factors collectively point to the need for improved asset management practices.

Coverage Ratio Summary

Coverage Score : 6.00

The coverage ratios indicate a moderate ability to meet its interest and dividend obligations. The interest coverage ratio is only average, suggesting a limited buffer to cover interest expenses. The equity dividend coverage ratio is average as well, indicating a somewhat constrained ability to cover dividend payments from equity. These coverage levels may be adequate but provide little margin for error, making the company vulnerable to fluctuations in earnings or interest rates.

Solvency Ratio Summary

Solvency Score : 10.00

The solvency reflects a strong financial position. The debt ratio is low, indicating minimal reliance on borrowed funds. The debt-to-equity ratio is also low, demonstrating a conservative capital structure. The equity ratio is high, showcasing a substantial proportion of assets financed by equity. The debt-to-asset ratio is low, further confirming a low level of debt relative to total assets. This conservative approach to leverage reduces financial risk and enhances long-term stability.

Liquidity Ratio Summary

Liquidity Score : 4.94

The liquidity position reveals both strengths and weaknesses. The quick ratio indicates a good ability to meet short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Conversely, the current ratio is weak, suggesting potential difficulties in covering current liabilities. The cash ratio is poor, reflecting very limited liquid cash reserves. The operating cash flow ratio is also weak, indicating inconsistency in generating cash from operations, potentially impacting short-term financial flexibility. This mixed performance suggests a need for better cash management.