Shivam Autotech Ltd
Automobiles & Auto Components | Small Cap
Shivam Autotech Ltd, operating in the Automobiles & Auto Components sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strengths in solvency and efficiency, alongside promising growth in earnings per share and net income. Its profitability, particularly in gross profit margin, return on capital employed, and operating margin, also stands out. However, the company faces challenges in liquidity and coverage, indicated by low ratios in these areas. While revenue and profit growth rates are lagging, the company's asset management, as reflected in the debt-to-asset ratio, is commendable. The negative adjusted EPS and cash EPS, coupled with a low book value per share, are areas of concern. Overall, Shivam Autotech exhibits potential for growth and profitability but needs to address its liquidity and financial efficiency to ensure long-term stability.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsUndervalued
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio6.00
- Financial Ratio2.80
- Profitability Ratio7.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio4.60
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Shivam Autotech Ltd, operating in the Automobiles & Auto Components sector, demonstrates a mixed financial performance. The company shows strengths in solvency and efficiency, alongside promising growth in earnings per share and net income. Its profitability, particularly in gross profit margin, return on capital employed, and operating margin, also stands out. However, the company faces challenges in liquidity and coverage, indicated by low ratios in these areas. While revenue and profit growth rates are lagging, the company's asset management, as reflected in the debt-to-asset ratio, is commendable. The negative adjusted EPS and cash EPS, coupled with a low book value per share, are areas of concern. Overall, Shivam Autotech exhibits potential for growth and profitability but needs to address its liquidity and financial efficiency to ensure long-term stability.
Latest Report
View AllLatest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
-4.37
Industry Median
23.95
Small Cap Median
24.12
P/E RATIO
-5.23
P/B RATIO
146.92
Industry Median
2.36
Small Cap Median
2.39
P/S RATIO
0.56
Industry Median
0.62
Small Cap Median
0.66
Others
PEG RATIO
0.78
EV/EBITDA RATIO
5.48
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹19.1 as on Apr 29, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
Quarterly Report⬤4th Feb 26
Quarterly Financial Results Q3 FY 2025-26
BEARISH SENTIMENT
The company's growth ratios present a mixed picture. While earnings per share and net income have shown substantial growth, revenue and operating profit growth rates are lagging. Asset growth is also negative, suggesting contraction. This indicates that the company is experiencing growth in certain areas but faces challenges in overall expansion. Diversifying growth drivers can mitigate risks.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -17.18 | -3.7 | 0.21 | 0 | -3.4 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | 50 | -8.97 | -30.99 | -12.24 | 2.33 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -39.47 | -28.8 | 116.79 | 44.72 | -11.19 |
| Asset Growth Rate | -12.67 | 2.34 | -13.87 | -8.67 | |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -37.84 | -30.43 | 118.75 | 42.86 | -4 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The company's financial ratios indicate a mixed performance. Negative adjusted EPS and cash EPS, coupled with a low book value per share, are areas of concern. However, capital expenditures are within an average range, suggesting continued investments in operations. Addressing the issues with earnings and book value is essential for improving financial health.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -2.27 | -1.33 | -2.91 | -4.18 | -3.7 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | 2.6 | 2.08 | 0 | -1.17 | -1.15 |
| Book Value Per Share | 11.3 | 11.5 | 8.67 | 4.58 | 2.38 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 18.9 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 4.9 | 7.1 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios present a mixed performance. While gross profit margin, return on capital employed, and operating margin are strong, return on equity and net margin are weak. Return on assets is above average. This suggests that the company excels in certain areas of profitability but faces challenges in overall efficiency. Enhancing profitability can improve financial performance.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 5.95 | 6.4 | 2.98 | 1.49 | 2.42 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -20.35 | -11.59 | -33.65 | -90.91 | -154.84 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 10.63 | 11.08 | 7.47 | 7.61 | 8.53 |
| Operating Margin | 16.02 | 15.14 | 10.43 | 9.15 | 9.69 |
| Net Margin | -4.72 | -3.41 | -7.45 | -10.64 | -10.57 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The company's efficiency ratios show a mixed performance. While days sales in inventory and receivable days suggest effective inventory and receivables management, the turnover ratios indicate underutilization of assets. This suggests that the company excels in certain areas of operation but faces challenges in maximizing asset utilization. Enhancing asset efficiency can improve profitability and overall financial performance.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 1.14 | 1.19 | 1.3 | 1.42 | 1.48 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 5.16 | 4.91 | 5.4 | 5.89 | 5.5 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 7.3 | 6.25 | 5.34 | 5.28 | 5.97 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 70.74 | 74.34 | 67.59 | 61.97 | 66.36 |
| Receivable Days | 50 | 58.4 | 68.35 | 69.13 | 61.14 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 1.33 | 1.47 | 1.44 | 1.96 | 2.93 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The company's coverage ratios are low, indicating a limited ability to cover interest and dividend payments. This can raise concerns about financial risk and vulnerability to economic downturns. Strengthening coverage ratios is essential for maintaining financial stability and investor confidence. Efficient financial management is crucial.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company's solvency position presents a mixed outlook. While the debt-to-asset ratio suggests a strong ability to cover assets with debt, the debt and equity ratios point to a higher reliance on debt financing. This indicates potential vulnerability to financial distress, though the company's asset backing provides some reassurance. A balanced approach to debt and equity financing is essential for long-term financial health.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.8 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 2.23 | 1.33 | 2.12 | 3.35 | 4 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.2 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.24 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position is weak, indicating potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. A low current ratio suggests that the company may struggle to cover its current liabilities with its current assets. This could lead to challenges in managing day-to-day operations and unexpected expenses. While low liquidity can be a concern, it's important to consider the company's ability to generate cash flow from operations and access to credit lines to mitigate liquidity risks.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 0.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.21 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munjal Showa Ltd | 7.80 | 23.55 | Neutral | 23.00 | 5.47 | 22.00 |
| 2 | Remsons Industries Ltd | 7.47 | 16.53 | Highly Undervalued | 50.00 | 3.39 | 21.00 |
| 3 | Goldstar Power Ltd | 7.01 | 7.62 | Neutral | 32.00 | 0.04 | 29.00 |
| 4 | Autoline Industries Ltd | 6.44 | 20.81 | Highly Undervalued | 79.00 | 8.52 | 38.00 |
| 5 | Pavna Industries Ltd | 6.29 | 41.19 | Neutral | 29.00 | 0.25 | 5.00 |
| 6 | PPAP Automotive Ltd | 6.14 | 8.33 | Highly Undervalued | 51.00 | 23.69 | 43.00 |
| 7 | Jullundur Motor Agency (Delhi) Ltd | 6.13 | 7.17 | Neutral | 33.00 | 10.73 | 30.00 |
| 8 | Omax Autos Ltd | 5.91 | 1511.00 | Neutral | 50.00 | 17.32 | N/A |
| 9 | Bharat Gears Ltd | 5.73 | 54.39 | Undervalued | 52.00 | 10.75 | 16.00 |
| 10 | Sintercom India Ltd | 5.69 | 151.90 | Neutral | 17.00 | 0.52 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd | 5.27 | 123.88 | Neutral | 8.00 | 6.52 | 3.00 |
| 12 | Pritika Auto Industries Ltd | 5.07 | 15.09 | Neutral | 71.00 | 0.95 | 23.00 |
| 13 | Pritika Engineering Components Ltd | 5.07 | 22.51 | Neutral | 22.00 | 2.48 | 7.00 |
| 14 | Shivam Autotech Ltd | 4.48 | -5.23 | Undervalued | 44.00 | -3.65 | -48.00 |
| 15 | Setco Automotive Ltd | 4.47 | -3.02 | Neutral | 109.00 | -0.10 | -126.00 |
Shivam Autotech Ltd's management effectiveness is rated 'Red' due to persistent financial underperformance. The company has faced stagnant revenue growth, net losses, and declining operating margins, signaling operational and financial difficulties. High debt levels and insufficient interest coverage raise concerns about financial stability. Although promoter holding remains significant, the absence of substantial institutional investment and consistent negative returns on equity indicate considerable management challenges.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONS | Revenue Growth | Stagnant | Limited ability to drive sales expansion. |
| Net Profit | Negative | Inability to generate profits consistently. | |
| Operating Margins | Declining | Operational inefficiencies affecting profitability. | |
| Interest Coverage | Low | Difficulty in meeting debt obligations. | |
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 69.52% | Indicates continued stake by key stakeholders. |
Financial Performance & Growth
Shivam Autotech's financial performance reveals a concerning trend. Sales growth has been inconsistent, resulting in stagnant overall expansion. The company has reported net losses in recent years, accompanied by a decline in operating profit margin (OPM), which highlights operational inefficiencies and challenges in converting sales into profit. This inconsistent and negative trend raises concerns about the company's financial management.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounded Sales Growth (%) | 3.08% | 9.42% | -5.01% | 0.25% | -0.15% | -3.34% |
| OPM (%) | 18.67% | 12.33% | 13.33% | 11% | 9% | 10% |
Capital Efficiency & Returns
Shivam Autotech struggles with capital efficiency and generating adequate returns. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is notably low, indicating inefficient use of capital. Return on Equity (ROE) is significantly negative, which means shareholder funds are not yielding positive returns. The company's negative ROE suggests difficulties in utilizing equity investments to generate profits, which could deter potential investors. Poor capital efficiency and negative returns raise significant concerns about the company's ability to create value for its shareholders.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE (%) | 15% | 5% | 5.67% | 3% | 2% | 3% |
| ROE (%) | 2.22% | -7.67% | -20.67% | -62.67% | -110% | NA |
Financial Health & Prudence
Shivam Autotech's financial health is concerning due to its high debt levels. The company's borrowings have been substantial over the years. The interest coverage ratio, calculated as Operating Profit divided by Interest, is very low, indicating difficulty in meeting interest obligations from operational profits. A low interest coverage ratio increases financial risk, as the company may struggle to service its debt if operating profits decline further. The company has not been paying dividends, suggesting that it is retaining earnings to manage its financial challenges.
| Metric | 2014–2016 | 2017–2019 | 2020–2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (₹ Cr) | 173 | 415 | 439 | 428 | 390 | 339 |
| Interest (₹ Cr) | 20.33 | 48 | 53.67 | 50 | 58 | 59 |
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
Shivam Autotech has a high level of promoter holding, which could indicate confidence from the company's founders and key stakeholders. However, the FII and DII holdings are very low, suggesting a lack of interest from institutional investors. A decrease in promoter holding from 74.80% to 69.52% in March 2025 is slightly concerning and may reflect changing dynamics or strategies within the company's leadership.
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding (%) | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 74.80 | 69.52 |
| FII Holding (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| DII Holding (%) | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 7.06 |
Shivam Autotech faces significant risks stemming from its poor financial performance and high debt levels. Inconsistent sales growth and continued net losses pose substantial operational challenges. The company's strained capacity to cover interest obligations further exacerbates its risk profile. Negative cash flows and fluctuating working capital cycles also contribute to increased financial instability, warranting a 'Red' rating.
Segment performance volatility
Quarterly sales and profit figures reveal volatility in Shivam Autotech's performance. Sales figures fluctuate, displaying variability in revenue generation. Profitability shows even greater swings, with net profits regularly dipping into negative territory. This inconsistency suggests potential challenges in maintaining stable and predictable financial outcomes.
| Quarter | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net Profit (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | 112 | 2 |
| Jun 2022 | 118 | -3 |
| Sep 2022 | 134 | -9 |
| Dec 2022 | 103 | -11 |
| Mar 2023 | 115 | -11 |
| Jun 2023 | 108 | -13 |
Foreign exchange or interest rate exposure
Interest expenses have been consistently high, ranging from ₹50 Cr to ₹59 Cr annually. Fluctuations in interest rates could significantly impact profitability, particularly given the company's existing financial struggles. The persistent interest obligations place a continuous burden on the company's financials.
| Year | Interest (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 57 |
| 2022 | 51 |
| 2023 | 50 |
| 2024 | 58 |
| 2025 | 59 |
Contingent liability evaluation
Total Liabilities have generally decreased from ₹734 Cr in March 2021 to ₹516 Cr in March 2025. The presence of significant liabilities suggests potential financial strain.
| Year | Total Liabilities (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 734 |
| 2022 | 641 |
| 2023 | 656 |
| 2024 | 565 |
| 2025 | 516 |
Regulatory compliance cost trends
Employee costs, as a percentage of sales, have generally increased over the years, ranging from about 8% to 14%. The rising trend could indicate an increasing cost burden from regulatory and labor standards.
| Year | Employee Cost % |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 12.60% |
| 2022 | 11.74% |
| 2023 | 11.98% |
| 2024 | 12.23% |
| 2025 | 12.57% |
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe