Super Spinning Mills Ltd
Textiles Apparels & Accessories | Small Cap
Super Spinning Mills Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel industry, shows a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strengths in managing its debt and sales in inventory. However, it faces challenges in liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability. The company's ability to handle short-term obligations and generate profits needs improvement. While the company has controlled capital expenditures, several financial metrics indicate areas of concern that could affect its long-term sustainability. The textile industry's competitive nature and fluctuating raw material prices add to these challenges. Looking ahead, Super Spinning Mills Ltd needs to focus on enhancing its core operational efficiencies and exploring growth opportunities to improve its financial standing.
Latest Report
View AllThe Latest Reports Are Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once They’re Available.
Latest News
View AllThe Latest News Is Not Available at the Moment. We’ll Notify You Once It’s Available.
- Valuation MetricsNeutral
- Market Metrics
- Stock Reports
- Stock News
- Growth Ratio2.00
- Financial Ratio3.60
- Profitability Ratio2.00
- Efficiency Ratio4.67
- Coverage Ratio2.00
- Solvency Ratio8.00
- Liquidity Ratio2.00
- Peer Assessment
- Management AssessmentWeak
- Risk AssessmentWeak
- 1 HourNeutral
- 2 HoursNeutral
- 4 HoursNeutral
- 1 DayNeutral
- 1 WeekNeutral
- 1 MonthNeutral
Super Spinning Mills Ltd, operating in the Textiles & Apparel industry, shows a mixed financial performance. The company demonstrates strengths in managing its debt and sales in inventory. However, it faces challenges in liquidity, growth, coverage, and profitability. The company's ability to handle short-term obligations and generate profits needs improvement. While the company has controlled capital expenditures, several financial metrics indicate areas of concern that could affect its long-term sustainability. The textile industry's competitive nature and fluctuating raw material prices add to these challenges. Looking ahead, Super Spinning Mills Ltd needs to focus on enhancing its core operational efficiencies and exploring growth opportunities to improve its financial standing.
Overall Valuation Score
P/E RATIO (TTM)
71.00
Industry Median
18.86
Small Cap Median
18.86
P/E RATIO
-4.97
P/B RATIO
0.54
Industry Median
1.69
Small Cap Median
1.69
P/S RATIO
0.08
Industry Median
0.86
Small Cap Median
0.86
Others
PEG RATIO
0.00
EV/EBITDA RATIO
2.88
The Calculations Shown Above Are Based on the Last Traded Price (LTP) of ₹4.97 as on Jun 17, 2026.
Unlock Live Chart
Please login to view interactive real-time technical charts powered by TradingView.
Markets Depth NSE
Buy Orders
Bid
Quantity
Orders
No buy depth
Total
0
0
Sell Orders
Ask
Quantity
Orders
No sell depth
Total
0
0
Markets Today NSE
High
0.00
Low
0.00
Open
0.00
Close
0.00
Prev Close
0.00
Avg Price
0.00
Volume
0
Last Traded Quantity
0
Last Traded Time
N/A
Price Movement Indicator
0.00
Today's Low
0.00
Today's High
The company's growth ratios raise concerns, as all metrics indicate poor performance. This suggests limited expansion and potential stagnation. While the company may have faced industry-specific challenges, focusing on strategic growth initiatives is essential to maintain competitiveness and attract investment. The weighted average calculation underscores the need for consistent and sustained growth across all areas.
| Growth Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth Rate | -19.51 | 13.01 | 19.19 | -15.53 | -21.52 |
| Operating Profit Growth Rate | -145.45 | -268 | -2.38 | -65.85 | -57.14 |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth | -400 | -113.98 | -69.64 | -808.82 | -58.51 |
| Asset Growth Rate | -33.66 | 2.24 | 3.28 | -9.89 | -11.37 |
| Net Income Growth Rate | -393.33 | -113.64 | -66.67 | -750 | -61.54 |
Revenue Growth Rate
Operating Profit Growth Rate
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Asset Growth Rate
Net Income Growth Rate
The financial ratios present a mixed view. While the company has managed its capital expenditures effectively, its earnings per share and book value need improvement. Balancing investments with profitability is crucial for enhancing overall financial health. The weighted average calculation highlights the need for balanced improvement across all financial metrics.
| Financial Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) | -9.5 | 0.17 | 0.33 | -2.5 | -3.67 |
| Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS) | -3.83 | 4.17 | 3.17 | -0.17 | 0.83 |
| Book Value Per Share | 10.67 | 11.67 | 12 | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Dividend Per Share (DPS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures (CapEx) | 19.4 | 4.4 | 9 | 4.9 | 30.9 |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS)
Cash Earnings Per Share (Cash EPS)
Book Value Per Share
Dividend Per Share (DPS)
Capital Expenditures (CapEx)
The company's profitability ratios raise concerns, as all metrics indicate poor performance. This suggests limited ability to generate profits from sales and investments. While the company may face competitive pressures and fluctuating costs, focusing on cost management and revenue optimization is essential to improve profitability. The weighted average calculation underscores the need for consistent and sustained improvement across all profitability metrics.
| Profitability Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | -11.73 | 5.19 | 4.55 | 0.45 | -1.14 |
| Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) | -17 | 13 | 13 | 2 | -2 |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -68.75 | 8.57 | 2.78 | -22.81 | -9.8 |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | -9.33 | 15.33 | 14.49 | 5.49 | 2.65 |
| Operating Margin | -6.38 | 9.48 | 7.77 | 3.14 | 1.71 |
| Net Margin | -11.22 | 1.35 | 0.38 | -2.91 | -1.43 |
Gross Profit Margin
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Operating Margin
Net Margin
The efficiency ratios present a mixed picture. While the company excels in managing its inventory and receivable days, its fixed asset and capital turnover ratios need improvement. Efficient inventory and receivables management is a positive sign, but optimizing asset utilization is crucial for enhancing overall operational efficiency. The weighted average calculation highlights the need for balanced improvement across all efficiency metrics.
| Efficiency Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio | 3.04 | 3.99 | 5.13 | 4.55 | 4.73 |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio | 4.84 | 9.44 | 8.78 | 8.46 | 8.74 |
| Receivables Turnover Ratio | 9.33 | 10.42 | 11.48 | 10.25 | 10.14 |
| Days Sales in Inventory Ratio | 75.41 | 38.67 | 41.57 | 43.14 | 41.76 |
| Receivable Days | 39.12 | 35.03 | 31.79 | 35.61 | 36 |
| Capital Turnover Ratio | 3.88 | 4.98 | 4.71 | 4.21 | 3.61 |
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Receivables Turnover Ratio
Days Sales in Inventory Ratio
Receivable Days
Capital Turnover Ratio
The coverage ratios indicate potential challenges in meeting interest and dividend obligations. This suggests the company should improve earnings and cash flow to ensure it can comfortably cover its financial commitments. The weighted average calculation emphasizes the importance of maintaining adequate coverage for long-term financial stability.
| Coverage Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Coverage Ratio | -1.03 | 1.29 | 1.12 | 0.21 | 0.65 |
| Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio |
Interest Coverage Ratio
Equity Dividend Coverage Ratio
The company demonstrates high solvency, primarily driven by its debt management. While high debt ratios can indicate risk, in this case, they reflect effective use of financial leverage. However, the low equity ratio suggests a need to balance debt with equity to ensure long-term financial stability. The weighted average approach highlights the importance of sustaining this balance for continued solvency.
| Solvency Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.47 |
| Debt to Equity Ratio | 0.59 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.89 |
| Equity Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.53 |
| Debt To Asset Ratio | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.2 |
Debt Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Equity Ratio
Debt To Asset Ratio
The company's liquidity position raises concerns as all the liquidity metrics reflect poor performance. This indicates potential difficulties in meeting short-term obligations. On a positive note, the company has been able to maintain a stable financial structure, but the inability to convert assets into cash quickly could hinder operational flexibility and growth. The weighted average calculation, emphasizing recent performance, underscores the need for immediate attention to improve liquidity.
| Liquidity Ratios | Mar 2012 | Mar 2013 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.8 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Operating Cash Flow Ratio | 0.42 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.02 |
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio
Cash Ratio
Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Peer Comparison empowers investors to evaluate a company against its industry peers using key financial metrics like P/E ratio, EPS, and profit margins. It helps identify whether a company is overvalued, undervalued, or performing in line with competitors. Investors can use this data to spot opportunities, assess risks, and make informed decisions. This contextual view adds depth beyond standalone company analysis.
| NO | Company Name | Health Score | P/E Ratio | Valuation | OPM | EPS | Latest Profit & Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mittal Life Style Ltd | 7.71 | 20.00 | Neutral | 7.12 | 0.04 | 2.29 |
| 2 | Nandani Creation Ltd | 7.03 | 27.46 | Neutral | 9.00 | 0.96 | 2.00 |
| 3 | Signoria Creation Ltd | 6.83 | 9.89 | Neutral | 7.93 | 8.80 | 4.19 |
| 4 | Shekhawati Industries Ltd | 6.49 | 9.59 | Overvalued | 8.32 | 2.55 | 8.81 |
| 5 | Jakharia Fabric Ltd | 6.41 | 22.57 | Overvalued | 6.89 | 8.05 | 3.27 |
| 6 | Shiva Mills Ltd | 5.79 | -14.15 | Neutral | 6.00 | -0.11 | N/A |
| 7 | Damodar Industries Ltd | 5.62 | 13.29 | Neutral | 32.00 | 2.31 | 5.00 |
| 8 | Vera Synthetic Ltd | 5.47 | 16.79 | Neutral | 3.76 | 4.11 | 2.03 |
| 9 | Mohit Industries Ltd | 5.32 | -14.61 | Neutral | 2.00 | -0.53 | -1.00 |
| 10 | Divyadhan Recycling Industries Ltd | 4.57 | 28.70 | Neutral | 4.80 | 1.19 | 1.71 |
| 11 | Laxmi Cotspin Ltd | 4.55 | -21.14 | Neutral | 1.00 | -0.69 | -1.00 |
| 12 | Flexituff Ventures International Ltd | 4.42 | 0.09 | Highly Undervalued | -106.00 | 73.32 | 238.00 |
| 13 | Celebrity Fashions Ltd | 4.23 | -3.27 | Neutral | -6.00 | -2.44 | -16.00 |
| 14 | Super Spinning Mills Ltd | 3.71 | -4.97 | Neutral | 6.00 | 0.07 | -5.00 |
| 15 | STL Global Ltd | 3.71 | -127.50 | Neutral | 1.00 | -0.08 | N/A |
| 16 | Morarjee Textiles Ltd | 3.71 | -0.19 | Neutral | -23.00 | -55.40 | -163.00 |
The management effectiveness of Super Spinning Mills Ltd is concerning due to inconsistent financial performance and poor capital efficiency. Sales and profit growth have been declining, with negative compounded growth rates over the recent years. Profitability margins are low, and the company has operated at a loss in some years. While the promoter holding is stable, the absence of institutional interest and poor return ratios raise concerns about the management's ability to improve the company's performance, meriting a 'Red' flag.
| Category | Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | Promoter Holding | 42.80% | Stable promoter confidence |
| CONS | Sales Growth (5Y) | -6% | Declining revenue expansion |
| Profit Growth (5Y) | N/A | Profit Growth data is unavailable | |
| Return on Equity | -8.38 | Poor shareholder returns |
Financial Performance & Growth
Super Spinning Mills Ltd. has demonstrated inconsistent financial performance. The compounded sales growth shows a negative trend over the past five and three years, with -6% and -8% respectively. The recent TTM sales growth is also negative at -21%. Similarly, compounded profit growth data is not available for 5 and 3 years, but TTM is -52%. This indicates significant challenges in maintaining and growing both sales and profits.
| Metric | 2010-2012 | 2013-2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Growth (%) | -5.56% | -18.55% | -21.45% |
The OPM % has declined significantly from 11% in 2010 and 2011 to 2% in Mar 2016, reflecting deteriorating operational efficiency. Net profit figures also show volatility, with losses reported in multiple years. In Mar 2015, the net profit was -₹13 Cr and in Mar 2016, it was -₹5 Cr. The company's reliance on core operations is evident, but the declining profitability is a major concern.
Capital Efficiency & Returns
The capital efficiency and returns of Super Spinning Mills Ltd. are notably weak. The current ROCE is a low 1.65, indicating poor utilization of capital employed. Similarly, the ROE is negative at -8.38, suggesting that shareholder funds are not generating adequate returns.
| Metric | 2011-2013 | 2014-2016 | |---|---| | Average ROCE (%) | 3% | 4.33% |
Historical ROCE data shows variability, with ROCE fluctuating over the years. Asset turnover data is not available. The cash conversion cycle fluctuates, with a range from 12 days in Mar 2010 to 145 days in Mar 2011, indicating inconsistent working capital management.
Financial Health & Prudence
The financial health and prudence of Super Spinning Mills Ltd. present a mixed picture. The company's debt management shows a decrease in borrowings from ₹200 Cr in Mar 2010 to ₹112 Cr in Mar 2016.
| Metric | 2010-2012 | 2013-2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Borrowings (₹ Cr) | 184 | 132 | 112 |
Interest coverage ratio data is not available. The company has not been paying dividends, with a Dividend Payout % of 0% consistently from Mar 2010 to Mar 2016.
Shareholding & Ownership Structure
The shareholding and ownership structure of Super Spinning Mills Ltd. shows stable promoter holding. The promoter holding has remained relatively constant at around 42.80% from June 2022 to March 2025. Institutional holding by FIIs is negligible, remaining at 0% for most quarters.
| Metric | Mar 2017 | Mar 2025 | |---|---| | Promoter Holding (%) | 42.46 | 42.80 |
Public holding accounts for a significant portion of the shares, consistently around 57%. The number of shareholders has increased from 9,864 in March 2017 to 16,661 in March 2025.
The risk assessment for Super Spinning Mills Ltd. is 'Red' due to the company's negative Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), indicating poor profitability and inefficient use of capital. Declining sales growth and inconsistent cash flows further exacerbate these risks. The absence of dividend payouts suggests financial constraints, leading to a high-risk profile.
Off-balance sheet exposure quantification
There is no specific data available on off-balance sheet exposure quantification.
Contingent liability evaluation
There is no specific data available on contingent liability evaluation.
Accounting quality red flags
There is no specific data available on Accounting quality red flags.
0 Credits RemainingUnlock Deep Technical Insights in Seconds Only with Dhanarthi AI
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Hour Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 2 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 4 Hours Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Day Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Week Timeframe
Overall Score
Strong Bearish
Bearish
Neutral
Bullish
Strong Bullish
Neutral
Market Sentiment
Analysis Driven By 1 Technical Indicators From The 1 Month Timeframe